My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-21_Agenda Packet
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2021
>
03-22-2021
>
03-22-21_Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2021 2:47:01 PM
Creation date
9/10/2021 2:45:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Density Bonus Agreement No. 2020-02, FX Residences <br />March 22, 2021 <br />Page 5 <br />5 <br />6 <br />8 <br />accessible major transit stop. The site provides 12 total parking spaces or 0.71 spaces per <br />unit, which includes ten tandem-parking stalls and two van accessible parking stalls. <br />Analysis of the Issues <br />Pursuant to Section 41-1607 of the SAMC, an application for a density bonus agreement is <br />required to be approved by the Planning Commission for any project containing “deviations” <br />(incentives/concessions and/or waivers). The Planning Commission’s review of the density <br />bonus agreement is based on the following findings: <br />1. The proposed development will materially assist in accomplishing the goal of <br />providing affordable housing opportunities in economically balanced communities <br />throughout the city. <br />2. The development will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the underlying zone <br />or applicable designation in the general plan land use element. <br />3. The deviation is necessary to make it economically feasible for the applicant to <br />utilize a density bonus authorized for the development pursuant to section 41- <br />1603. <br />The project does not require a Site Plan Review Application pursuant to Section 41-2007 of <br />the SAMC. Accordingly, the Planning Commission’s review and determination for this <br />request are limited to the provisions of the Density Bonus Agreement application only. <br />Table 4: Analysis of the Requested Incentives/Concessions (3) and Waivers (2) <br />Standard Analysis <br />Lot Width <br />(Incentive/Concession) <br />The minimum lot width required for the Stacked Dwelling Building Type is a <br />range between 125 and 200 feet. The overall the site is comprised of four <br />lots that would be consolidated into one developable lot. Even after lot <br />consolidation, the development site would have a smaller than average lot <br />width, compared to most lots in the area. Lots in the area range in lot depth <br />and width but are on average 250 feet by 250 feet. In comparison, the site <br />would have a lot width and depth of 100 feet and 150 feet, with a deviation <br />of 25 feet for the minimum required lot width. Although the site has a <br />deviation of 25 feet in the lot width, the applicant’s stacked dwelling building <br />design still accomplishes the intention of the TZC by providing a compatible <br />design and balanced composition of massing on the project site, with <br />appropriate interior floor area and individual unit sizes. <br />Tandem Parking <br />(Inventive/Concession) <br />The TZC provides affordable housing incentives by allowing for tandem <br />parking not to exceed 30-percent of the required parking per residential unit. <br />Of the required twelve parking stalls, only three parking spaces are permitted <br />as tandem parking. As designed, ten of the total twelve (83-percent) parking <br />stalls would be tandem, which exceeds the allowable. Maintaining the <br />required tandem-parking standard would result in a complete site redesign <br />involving more of the site area dedicated to parking. This would result in the <br />significant loss of bedroom units and common open space. In order to <br />maintain the current proposed unit count, the developer would be required <br />to construct an additional level, resulting in a different type of construction <br />(steel-frame versus wood), further increasing development costs. <br />City Council 2 –5 3/22/2021
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.