My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #33
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
09/21/2021 Regular and Special
>
Correspondence - #33
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2021 4:52:11 PM
Creation date
9/20/2021 10:11:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
549
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Sitting on Roughly $25 Million in Rental Assistance for No Good Reason <br />The City is apparently seeking to establish a "regulatory framework and infrastructure necessary <br />to implement residential rent stabilization, just cause eviction, and other protections for tenants" <br />that would rival the California Employment Development Department in its inability to serve those <br />who need help the most. Take for example the more than $42 million of Emergency Rental <br />Assistance program funding from federal and state agencies that has been allocated to the City <br />of Santa Ana's COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP). <br />Only 3.6% of Santa Ana households have been helped to date and even with the new reported <br />funds disbursement rate itwould take well over another year to ensure all the funds are allocated. <br />If the City can't even manage to get free money to the tune of $25 million through ERAP in the <br />hands of tenants, one must wonder how it proposes to manage a program that will be reliant on <br />"the collection of fees from owners and the hiring of at least 25 staff... based on the future fiscal <br />impact of the ordinances [which] is unknown... due to the nature of this due diligence process, <br />which could take staff from 9 to 12 months to complete." <br />Ignorance of Existing State Protections Does Not Justify Bad Local Policy <br />Since the start of the pandemic, the California State Legislature has passed various eviction <br />moratoria to keep residents housed and the Judicial Council of California approved on April 6, <br />2020 rules, including effectively suspending all unlawful detainer actions until ninety days after <br />California's COVID-19 state of emergency ends. This suspends the issuance of a summons and <br />entry of defaults in unlawful detainer actions, meaning new unlawful detainer cases cannot be <br />filed in most circumstances, unless there is a health and safety reason. <br />Through spring 2022, in accordance with AB 832, property owners are required to take steps in <br />compliance with state law to demonstrate that they have made a good faith effort to seek rental <br />assistance for a tenant or that they worked with a tenant who is seeking relief before seeking <br />the termination of residential tenancy. <br />Moreover, existing statewide rent control and just cause law (AB 1482 - Tenant Protection Aci <br />of 2019) provides a consistent standard to all tenants, the courts, and landlords. The proposed <br />local ordinances only seek to cause confusion when robust tenant protections already exist. <br />Rent Control Leads to Unintended Consequences, Hurting the Community <br />In a 2016 report on "Perspectives on Helping Low -Income Californians Afford Housing" by the <br />California Legislative Analyst's Office, researchers found that "many housing programs - <br />vouchers, rent control, and inclusionary housing - attempt to make housing more affordable <br />without increasing the overall supply of housing [and] this approach does very little to address <br />the underlying problem." <br />I; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.