Laserfiche WebLink
TENANT WELFARE DESTROYS HOUSING! <br />wspA Please go to aoausa.com/protest <br />STOP <br />FORCED <br />TENANT„ <br />WELFARE <br />Our Cost for Tenant Welfare <br />UFRONNLArj BOR IS <br />ENSLAV TUTZONAL <br />EMENT <br />AOAPAC <br />The Facts: As an example, under Tenant Welfare (Rent Control), some consumers pay $1,200 per month for <br />an apartment with a fair market value of $2,000. The individual business owner is thereby being forced to <br />subsidize that consumer for a total of $800 every month! Why not also require all other businesses, like <br />grocery stores, restaurants auto dealers, etc., to give 40% off their fair price to these tenants or have all <br />taxpayers pay for this program? Why force a small group of business owners, who provide housing, to pay <br />100%of the cost of this welfare program? Does this not look like discrimination to you? If all taxpayers <br />cannot afford to provide this welfare, how do lawmakers expect a group of small business owners to carry <br />this total burden without destroying housing and its providers? <br />Unethical and a Total Disgrace <br />Plus, to force this small number of business men and women to carry the total cost of assuring that these <br />lawmakers get re-elected is a total disgrace and contrary to our American Economic System of Free <br />Enterprise. <br />Redistributing other people's wealth and labor, and thereby destroying their retirement plans, is totally <br />wrong and will eventually lead, not only to the destruction of housing, but also the destruction of a <br />moral society! The integrity of the lawmaker who votes for tenant welfare is questionable! Are these <br />lawmakers Americans or are they Bernie Sanders Socialists? Even socialists believe that the cost of <br />welfare should be shared by all the people (except the "elite"). They seem to be more ethical and <br />logical than those who "say"they believe in free enterprise and then vote for"rent control"?M <br />