My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #9
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
10/05/2021 Regular and Special
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2021 5:40:29 PM
Creation date
10/4/2021 9:53:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Araiza, Fatima <br />From: Miriam Meza <mmeza@amcliving.com> <br />Sent: Friday, October 01, 2021 3:23 PM <br />To: eComment; Sarmiento, Vicente; Penaloza, David; Phan, Thai; Lopez, Jessie; Bacerra, <br />Phil; Hernandez, Johnathan; Mendoza, Nelida <br />Subject: IMPORTANT: Santa Ana Ordinance Opposition <br />Dear Mayor Sarmiento & Members of Santa Ana City Council, <br />First, I would like to thank all of you for your hard work and dedication as members of the community and <br />more importantly your passion for standing in your position as Council Members. <br />As a resident and Housing -Provider of the city of Santa Ana, I would like to express my opposition and <br />concerns for the new Santa Ana Ordinance that took place in the last City Council Meeting. <br />Through this pandemic, my job as a Property Manager has not been easy with ongoing changes to policy and <br />procedures. My main purpose has always been and will remain prioritizing my residents to ensure a safe and <br />healthy living environment through times of uncertainty. I am sure we could all agree. <br />However, I do believe the Santa Ana Ordinance will affect the quality of living for our residents. It gives us as <br />responsible landlords little to no control over our community. With potential increases of fraud and instability. <br />The proposed plan would allow tenants to add occupants without our knowledge which would allow <br />overcrowding in a unit. Overcrowding is simply a fire hazard and is one of the reasons why there are <br />occupancy policies in place. All our residents who bring other occupants are screened through a background <br />check. We want to allow qualified individuals to our community to protect the quiet and peaceful enjoyment <br />for all of our residents. The crime rates have significantly increased over the years, especially in Santa Ana. <br />Though the rent cap in theory seems like a beneficial idea to most residents, it is simply not ideal in the long <br />term. Rent increases go toward reinvesting and maintaining our beautiful community. Our community is over <br />fifty years old and is expensive to maintain. With the raising cost in materials and labor, we need the flexibility <br />to send out rent increases that are fair for our residents and fair for us to ensure we are providing a long-term <br />home for our residents. These laws clearly overstep existing state laws and imposes onerous restrictions that <br />affect my ability to provide safe, quality housing to my residents. The proposed limitations are not feasible for <br />landlords and most importantly, for our residents. <br />I respectfully ask the council to take no further action on this matter. <br />Miriam Meza I Community Director <br />Washington ]Place Apartments 1 1311 E. Washington h1. Santa Ana I C A 192701 <br />r: 714-547-7539 1 : Livewash.tng on lalace.corn <br />Go Green! Print this email only whennecessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.