My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #9
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
10/05/2021 Regular and Special
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2021 5:40:29 PM
Creation date
10/4/2021 9:53:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Araiza, Fatima <br />From: Opittek <eopittek@cox.net> <br />Sent: Friday, October 01, 2021 1:29 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Subject: SA Rent Control <br />My opinion for consideration. Our family has owned a small apartment building in Santa Ana for over 70 years, kept our <br />rents low and have had no evictions to my knowledge. We worked with one tenant and received some Covid rent relief <br />funds. We are totally against rent control since it has been shown in studies to result in property degradation, slums and <br />stops future development investment. And this at a time when there is a housing shortage in CA. If you are hell bent on <br />passing this, consider a 1-2 year sunset and collect data such as # units, bldg. age, rents, sales, values, code violations, <br />building permits, etc., then reconsider at the end of that period. Also your rent increase cap is too low, consider CPI or <br />3% whichever is greater. I have read that 70% of residential bldgs are over 50 yrs old (probably older in SA) and you <br />know all costs, but especially maintenance costs, have significantly increased. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.