My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #9
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
10/05/2021 Regular and Special
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2021 5:40:29 PM
Creation date
10/4/2021 9:53:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Subject: <br />Dear Councilmember, <br />spmrite@verizon.net <br />Tuesday, October 05, 2021 1:52 PM <br />eComment <br />Santa Ana Rent Control <br />I wish to express my opposition to the proposed "City of Santa Ana Community Preservation, Rent Stabilization, <br />Tenants' Rights Act" that appears on the October 5th city council agenda. <br />Our family has been providing multi -family housing for decades. This included a trailer park in Santa Ana that <br />provided a unique niche of housing as it was reasonably priced so people were able to afford living there on a low <br />income. If you have ever been involved with owning and or managing property, you will know that it is a difficultjob <br />with not a large profit margin when you take into consideration all of the rising costs that are incurred by owners. I <br />don't understand why so much regulation has been put on housing providers. We don't tell supermarkets what they <br />can charge for food or restaurants what they can charge for their meals and these products/services are deemed <br />essential to the public. Now housing seems to be considered not just a right, but also monitored at a controlled <br />price. However, if rents don't keep up commensurately with other costs, people will not want to own and run <br />housing communities. Individuals and companies have been fleeing to other states to reinvest their money where it <br />will go farther without such draconian regulations. <br />It seems that by passing these measures, the city wants to own and run housing and eliminate private ownership. <br />Could this be true? If that's the goal, then so be it as we will take our investments elsewhere, but this will be <br />detrimental to our residents who have been very pleased with our management throughout the years. <br />In closing, we housing providers feel our hands are tied and we will be unable to provide economical, clean and safe <br />housing with these type of policies, especially in light of just cause eviction policies. We have a difficult enough time <br />keeping our communities drug and crime free and now it is becoming an impossible task. <br />I believe that the proposed "City of Santa Ana Community Preservation, Rent Stabilization, Tenants' Rights Act" is <br />severely flawed and punitive against rental -housing providers. For these reasons and those highlighted above, I <br />respectfully ask that the city take no further action on this matter until such time as the city can engage in additional study <br />and engage in discussions with rental housing providers in the city. <br />Thank you for your time and consideration, <br />Heidi Chew <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.