My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Packet_10-20-21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Zoning Administrator (2009-Present)
>
2021
>
10.20.21
>
Packet_10-20-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2021 3:20:06 PM
Creation date
10/25/2021 3:19:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PM No. 2019-01 – Saint Thomas 3-Lot Subdivision <br />October 20, 2021 <br />Page 3 <br />2 <br />0 <br />0 <br />1 <br />Corrigan retired from aviation in 1950 and bought an eighteen-acre orange grove in Santa <br />Ana, where he would construct the single-family residence. Corrigan lived there with his <br />wife and three sons until his death in 1995. While the existing residence is associated <br />with Douglas Carrigan, no historical or significance events occurred on the property. <br />Moreover, the single-family residence cannot be said to have “distinguishing <br />characteristics of an architectural style or period, that exemplify a particular architectural <br />style or design features,” as required by Chapter 30 of the SAMC for listing in the Santa <br />Ana Historic Register. Therefore, the property is not eligible for inclusion in the Santa Ana <br />Register. Nonetheless, staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring that the <br />applicant provide a plaque honoring and recognizing Douglas Corrigan, upon completion <br />of the project. <br />On January 2019, an application was submitted to process a parcel map subdivision to <br />an existing parcel located at 2828 North Flower Street. The application was then <br />processed through the City's Development Review Committee and after several formal <br />and informal re-submittals the design was approved in August of 2021. Subsequently, the <br />applicant proceeded to submit the formal discretionary application to approve a parcel <br />map in order to subdivide the existing lot into three parcels. <br />Project Analysis <br />Subdivision requests are governed by Chapter 34 and Chapter 41 of the SAMC. Pursuant <br />to Section 66473.5 and 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act, applications for <br />tentative parcel maps are approved when it can be shown that findings can be made in <br />support of the request. Specifically, the findings are related to the proposal being <br />consistent with the General Plan; that the site is in conformance with all applicable City <br />ordinances; the project site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed <br />project; the proposed project will not cause substantial environmental damage or <br />substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat; that the proposed <br />project will not cause serious public health problems; or that the proposed project will not <br />conflict with easements necessary for public access through or use of the property must <br />be made. Using this information staff has prepared the following analysis, which, in turn <br />forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. In analyzing the <br />applicant's request, staff believes that the following analysis warrants approval of the <br />tentative parcel map (Exhibit 6). <br />The applicant is seeking approval of a tentative parcel map to subdivide an existing parcel <br />of land into three lots. Upon completion of the subdivision, the lots will continue to be <br />utilized for residential use in the form of single-family structures. Since this application is <br />to subdivide a lot and approve a conceptual design of the new single-family homes, no <br />major issues were identified with the proposal since the design and site improvements <br />did not require additional discretionary approvals. In reviewing the project, staff <br />determined that the proposal as conditioned is consistent with the various provisions of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.