My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
11/02/2021 Regular and Special
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2021 2:22:07 PM
Creation date
11/2/2021 1:27:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
11/2/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. V. <br />SantaAna <br />Tenants United Santa Ana <br />Santa Ana, CA <br />November 1st, 2021 <br />RE: An open letter to the California Apartment Association and Apartment Association of <br />Orange County, as well as to supporters of the REFERENDUM AGAINST [ORDINANCES] PASSED <br />BY THE CITY COUNCIL [OF SANTA ANA] <br />Dear Victor Cao et al., <br />We wish to address your efforts for a referendum against the two new tenant protection <br />ordinances in Santa Ana. As your organization claims to value transparency and community <br />outreach, we must bring to your attention that individuals who are gathering signatures for your <br />referendum are utilizing misleading and outright incorrect information just to collect signatures. <br />It is of the utmost urgency, and in respect of democratic, bureaucratic, and electoral integrity, <br />that these tactics cease immediately, or be investigated and pursued to the fullest extent. <br />Utilizing deceptive, misleading, and verifiably false information to acquire signatures for a <br />referendum is in direct violation of California's Elections Code of Law, beginning at section <br />18600. Below are some of the most egregious claims being stated, simply to get people to sign: <br />"The ordinances make it illegal to evict criminals" <br />The ordinances do not state such whatsoever and actually do quite the opposite. In cases where <br />any alleged criminal activity is taking place in a rental unit, the landlord can still evict the <br />individual so long as proof exists — not just an allegation. The Just Cause ordinance also ensures <br />that anyone else who lives in a unit is not evicted along with the alleged criminal. This ensures <br />strong protection for victims of crimes to be able to remain housed when a separate tenant <br />living on the property may be committing crimes. If any person who remains in the unit <br />attempts to allow the alleged criminal to enter the property, that constitutes grounds for <br />eviction of the individual aiding the alleged criminal in re-entering the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.