My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
11/16/2021 Regular
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2021 1:30:33 PM
Creation date
11/15/2021 3:07:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
11/16/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Orozco, Norma <br />From:Nathaniel Greensides <mynci90@gmail.com> <br />Sent:Thursday, November 11, 2021 3:07 PM <br />To:eComment; Ridge, Kristine <br />Subject:Fwd: Tenant Issues - 1013 S Standard Ave <br />This is a non-agenda item for the upcoming City Council meeting on November 16th. At the November 2nd <br />meeting, Councilmember Mendoza had asked for a presentation regarding the impacts of Rent Stabilization. I <br />wish to offer this communication we had before the November 2nd meeting. <br />Sincerely, <br />Nathaniel Greensides <br />Ward 5 resident <br /> <br />---------- Forwarded message --------- <br />From: Nathaniel Greensides <mynci90@gmail.com> <br />Date: Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:56 PM <br />Subject: Re: Tenant Issues - 1013 S Standard Ave <br />To: Mendoza, Nelida <nmendoza@santa-ana.org> <br /> <br />Thank you for providing those clips to me. I have actually watched one of them in the past. I don't personally <br />have the capacity to translate the contents of the videos into Spanish. I would like to make some clarifications <br />and counter arguments to those posed in the videos you sent me. My points below are pretty long, so feel free to <br />read at your leisure. I am open to a meeting with you. It would be on a personal level and not on behalf of the <br />coalition. <br />Best regards, <br />Nathaniel <br /> <br />"the problem with rent control is that it ultimately manipulates supply and demand and ends up creating a self <br />destructing chain reaction in the rental market. Whenever the government caps rental prices, demand <br />skyrockets." <br />Supply and demand may be affected by any government policies. However, the demand will remain largely <br />unaffected - especially in highly desirable cities such as ours. With rent increases stabilized, a huge swath of <br />current residents will cease their search for a new place to live. Thus the local rental market may largely remain <br />unaffected. Currently, long term residents have to compete against non-Santa Ana residents just to ensure they <br />can remain a part of our City. <br /> <br />"Artificially low prices attract more renters so the newly rent controlled units get snatched up quickly." Newly <br />vacant units can be rented at market rates under California state law existing since 1995 called Costa Hawkins. <br />Any artificially low price is the choice of the individual landlord or property owner upon new vacancy. <br />Additionally, the two ordinances proposed here in our City allow for individual petitions should the stabilized <br />max of three percent be insufficient for maintenance and upgrades. Newly rent controlled units - again, upon <br />vacancy, the LL can rent at local market rates, not previous rate as paid by former tenants - will get "snatched <br />up" as quickly as non-rent controlled units in the city due to the sheer fact that the supply of housing in our <br />highly desirable City is so low. <br /> <br />"Where the problem begins is that by restricting rental prices, LLs inevitably decide it isn't financially feasible <br />to rent units under rent control." Neither the ordinances nor any rent control laws in the USA restrict rental <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.