My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/07/2021 Regular
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 5:07:58 PM
Creation date
12/6/2021 9:03:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/7/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UCI Community Resilience <br /> December 7, 2021 <br /> Santa Ana City Council <br /> c/o Daisy Gomez <br /> Clerk of the Council <br /> 20 Civic Center Plaza <br /> Santa Ana, CA 92702 <br /> ecomment(a,santa-ana.org <br /> Re: Public Comment to Agenda Item #37 for December 7,2021 Santa Ana City Council Meeting <br /> Dear Mayor Sarmiento and Council Members: <br /> I am writing to express concerns that the community outreach process for the Santa Ana General Plan <br /> Update has not sufficiently engaged with the perspectives and needs of impacted residents in Santa Ana. <br /> Furthermore,the policies the city is proposing to adopt into the General Plan do not adequately address <br /> the decades-long soil-lead crisis and its toll on the health of our most vulnerable communities. <br /> UCI Community Resilience Projects, a unit within the UCI Office of Sustainability,has supported iPlo- <br /> NO! Santa Ana! (Lead-Free Santa Ana% a community-academic partnership formed in 2017,to <br /> investigate and remediate soil lead in Santa Ana and to advocate for the health equity needs of Santa <br /> Ana's disadvantaged communities. <br /> Through soil sample testing,we found that over 50%of residential samples had levels of lead that <br /> exceeded California EPA recommendations.What's more,we found that the neighborhoods most <br /> impacted by soil-lead contamination were also: <br /> • Predominantly people of color <br /> • Lower median household income <br /> • Lower%of college educated residents <br /> • Higher proportions of renters <br /> • Higher fraction of residents without health insurance <br /> • Higher proportion of residents with immigrant status background <br /> • Limited English proficiency <br /> • Predominantly Latinx/Hispanic residents <br /> These frontline communities in Santa Ana face a disproportionate impact of lead in their everyday lives, <br /> and yet they have been left out of the decision-making process that decides how to address the issue. This <br /> is why it is critical that moving forward we ensure that stakeholders that can give voice to their <br /> community are included in the city's planning efforts. <br /> The City Council has shown a willingness to engage in this process before. Last fall,the City Council <br /> paused the adoption of the General Plan Update and invited community stakeholders, including iPlo-NO! <br /> Santa Ana!,to a series of roundtable discussions to inform the development of a community survey for <br /> outreach and engagement. Additionally,the City Planning Department invited iPlo-NO! Santa Ana! to a <br /> series of meetings to present research and inform policies to address the soil-lead crisis. <br /> 1 <br /> Ma61 ing ddirass: c/o UCI II...aw, 401. l::::ast II::�aIkasoirn II)irve, 3u to 1.000, Ili 6irwa, CA 92 97...1.000 <br /> I::�h s6call ddirass: Suirnirneir 3ass6oirn I13' (13uH6ir:g 230), 3u to 1.1.0, umU ll, Ilia ine CA 92697 <br /> (949) 824 2489 coirrwirrwu ini tyiras61l6eirnce.u.:c6.edu.: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.