My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/07/2021 Regular
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 5:07:58 PM
Creation date
12/6/2021 9:03:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/7/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dale Helvig <br /> 2536 N. Valencia St. Santa Ana CA 92706 <br /> 714-541-7254 helvig_denny@msn.com IF <br /> ITEM 14 <br /> IMPLEMENTATION <br /> The Land Use Element does not address the absence of 200 acres of parkland and the profound impact <br /> this will have on the physical, social, mental, and economic health and well-being of Santa Ana <br /> residents. <br /> ITEM 15 <br /> GENERAL COMMENTS <br /> Why were areas north of the 1-5 Freeway excluded from the environmental justice consideration? <br /> Homes next to the freeway in the communities of Mabury Park, Grand Sunrise and Park Santiago are <br /> areas that have environmental issues as well. There is lead in the soil, as well as other pollutants. Heavy <br /> particulates and noise concerns are also an issue due to the proximity to the freeway. <br /> In summary, I see don't see much meat in General Plan. Although a tremendous amount of effort has <br /> been spent on this project, I see the General Plan as a blueprint for development rather than a vision <br /> for the City of Santa Ana. The draft vision of the city to strive to maintain the parkland space is not <br /> even met. With the buildout population increase of over 96,000 people,just to maintain the current <br /> deficient ratio of 1 acre per 1000 residents we need to have a vision of 192 of additional parkland <br /> space. Notice the 2045 vision for increased parkland space is ZERO. <br /> LAND USE PLAN <br /> SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN SAME; net change is zero <br /> * Land Ratio <br /> Potential 2045d+ <br /> 334,774 population* and 343.8 parkland 407,022 population and 343.8 parkland <br /> Table 3-7 Gene►al Plan U date Exi�tin attid Buildaut Po ulatian <br /> Flaanin Area Exis�i R�r�I�tpm 9urdou�Ro u�flon Percer+t rardfs <br /> Ft7Cll5 AREA5 3b,TT' 'f7.550 t 11 <br /> 5-s Free+,av:i3�er Read E.�73� 3t OSE1 2=:4 <br /> i�ra�avens�t�thst+=e< <,oT� �_t� z�3 Does not match <br /> S� q Bnsto Stree' 6.35C 19.1'S i <br /> South FAain street E.97C 7.mt3 p <br /> 4°Lest 5an�ara Bou erard 1Q,304 S2 652 23 <br /> ALL Lei FiER 19REA5[}F T lE CITY 287.887 �g <br /> CtTYWlOf Tl1TAL' 334,T74 431,629 29 <br /> suurm�� �s�d aM n- ���acel'VarLs.zoev Fseiha�,y r .s �y flr+>w:oa�t�i� <br /> � T6t�' 'atrn Fnel.�aa aI3 ut7ud�rai I M houe+ahNdB,ma!tU'Y5es31 roes guartars and xrrr�stUnan� rauP �AFr3 <br /> Page 8 of 9 <br /> 2021-12-07 Letter to City Council-GP Comments on Land Use Element <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.