My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/07/2021 Regular
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 5:07:58 PM
Creation date
12/6/2021 9:03:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/7/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to City of Santa Ana Planning Commission <br /> September 15, 2021 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Implementation Action [OS-]1.6. Development fees. Evaluate the fees required by <br /> the City's Acquisition and Development Ordinance and adjust them to better <br /> reflect current costs and needs. Update requirements regarding where fees are <br /> spent. <br /> Open Space Element at 16. The City proposes to implement the action in 2022. <br /> Implementation Action 1.6 has been modified from the version in the previous <br /> 2020 draft Update, and is now much less specific than before. That earlier version <br /> (previously Implementation Action 1.8) called for the City to <br /> [c]onsider updating the City's Acquisition and Development Ordinance to better <br /> reflect current costs and needs by increasing the parkland dedication requirement, <br /> and require that fees collected in place of parkland dedication for specific <br /> development projects be utilized to acquire, expand, or improve facilities within <br /> the same quadrant or geographic subarea (as defined in the Parks Master Plan) as <br /> the project for which the fee was collected. <br /> 2020 Draft Open Space Element at 15. The more specific language in the earlier version <br /> of the implementation action should be retained in order to strengthen the City's <br /> development fee program. In particular, development fees should be used to provide new <br /> parkland in the same neighborhood impacted by the development. That geographic <br /> limitation should be based on walking distance from the development project(the same <br /> approach used for the park dedication requirements in Implementation Action OS-1.7), <br /> rather than "quadrant or geographic subarea." <br /> We propose revising Implementation Action OS-1.6 as follows: <br /> Implementation Action OS-1.6. Development fees. Evaluate the fees FequiFed by <br /> Update the City's Acquisition and Development Ordinance and adjust them to <br /> bettef fetleet etfffent eosts andneeds. Update-to increase the parkland dedication <br /> requirements f-e-ga ding w-hefe roes afe spent-for new development projects <br /> consistent with the dedication requirements specified in Implementation Action <br /> OS-1.7. Require that fees collected in place of parkland dedication for specific <br /> development projects be utilized to acquire, expand, or improve facilities within <br /> 0.5 miles walking distance from the project for which the fee was collected. <br /> 8. Proposed Changes to the Open Space Element's Parkland Dedication Requirement <br /> The Open Space Element currently includes the following provision: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.