My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/07/2021 Regular
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 5:07:58 PM
Creation date
12/6/2021 9:03:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/7/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SHUT_ MIHALY- I N BERGERLLP <br /> 396 HAYES STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 GABRIEL M.B. ROSS <br /> T: (415) 552-7272 F: (415) 552-5816 Attorney <br /> www.smwiaw.com Ross@smwlaw.com <br /> November 9, 2020 <br /> Via Email <br /> City of Santa Ana Planning Commission <br /> 20 Civic Center Plaza <br /> Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> c/o Commission Secretary Sarah Bernal <br /> e a gsa o®a a,or . <br /> Re: Santa Ana General Plan Update EIR, Clearinghouse No. <br /> 2020020987 <br /> Dear Chair McLoughlin and Commissioners: <br /> On behalf of Rise Up Willowick, I write to comment on the proposed Santa <br /> Ana General Plan Update ("the Update") and its accompanying Environmental Impact <br /> Report("EIR"). <br /> In the Final EIR the City has proposed changes and additions to the <br /> Update's Open Space Element that seek to create new parkland and avoid loss of <br /> parkland. We commend the City for including these measures in response to feedback <br /> received on the Draft EIR. However, these General Plan measures are insufficient: they <br /> do not fully explain how increased creation of parkland will work, and are ambiguous as <br /> to what lands are included in a proposed prohibition on net loss of parkland. Moreover, <br /> the Open Space Element calls for several Municipal Code amendments to put these <br /> General Plan polices into effect, but would defer them until 2022. This will create a <br /> period of uncertainty until the measures are fully implemented. We urge the City to <br /> revise the Open Space Element to clarify these ambiguities, and to defer the Update so <br /> that it can be adopted concurrently with these code amendments. Moreover, the City <br /> should defer the Update so that it can be aligned with the City's new Housing Element <br /> and code amendments to strengthen the City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO). <br /> The revised Open Space Element Policy 1.3 indicates that the City should <br /> "prioritize the creation and dedication of new public parkland over the collection of <br /> impact fees" for new residential development in Focus Areas. Rise Up Willowick <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.