Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 5: HISTORICAL ELECTRICITY USE AND RATE SCHEDULES <br />This is the preferred rate schedule to use with this project, but if it is not available, rate schedule RES-BCT will <br />work. <br />III III..... III III..... III. IIL... III..... II[;;; III* II[;;; III & II[;;; II1 Ilf °: ,,,, III..... III III..... III „III III ,......,, Ilf III I11 I11 III II[;;; IiG III „ „III III Ilf °III..... III III II[;;; &,,,, <br />ii, „o <br />A more conventional approach to using excess renewable generation at one site to offset electricity use at <br />another site is RES-BCT. This approach requires that the sites have the same owner, but they do not need to be <br />contiguous. One Generating Account can deliver power to up to 50 Benefitting Accounts. This could assure that <br />excess power at the South Station and the two hydro turbines could always be used to offset energy use at <br />various pump loads. <br />The disadvantage to RES-BCT is that the full retail value of the electricity does not get transferred to the other <br />meter. The Generation portion of the rate transfers, but the Delivery Service (Transmission and Distribution) <br />does not transfer. Under the Schedule TOU-GS-1-13 likely to be used, this excludes a portion of the monetary <br />savings. <br />These projects are evaluated in this report using the RES-BCT rate, which is the likely default. They will also be <br />evaluated using the NEMA rate, which is more beneficial to the City, but not guaranteed to be accepted, should <br />it be pursued with SCE. <br />'IeW�W�C01nnl[9 I(JCosur°inll�f�,�lCC01,u.m�ii�: " 26 — 69 G II�II 112 11�.11 N <br />PREVIEW Date: Nov 03, 2021 Workspace ID: WS00800354 Funding Opportunity Number: R22AS00023 <br />