My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #39
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/21/2021 Regular
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #39
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2021 9:23:19 AM
Creation date
12/21/2021 10:24:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/21/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�k <br /> NATO <br /> December 21, 2021 <br /> Mayor Vicente Sarmiento <br /> Members of the Santa Ana City Council <br /> 22 Civic Center Plaza <br /> Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> RE: Proposed Flavored Tobacco Products Ban <br /> Dear Mayor Sarmiento and Councilmembers: <br /> As the Executive Director of the National Association of Tobacco Outlets (NATO), a national retail <br /> trade association that represents more than 60,000 retail stores throughout the country including many <br /> Santa Ana retail stores, I am writing to submit our comments and concerns regarding Ordinance <br /> Prohibiting the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products on your December 21, 2021, agenda. This would <br /> ban the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, mint and wintergreen <br /> smokeless tobacco products, flavored cigars and flavored pipe tobacco. We would ask that the City <br /> Council not adopt this ordinance for the reasons explained below. <br /> Three Studies Find that Banning Flavored Tobacco Products Is Associated with Increased Youth and <br /> Young Adult Smoking <br /> According to a growing number of studies, the banning of all flavored tobacco products can result in <br /> increasing the number of underage youth and young adults that start to smoke, or return to smoking, <br /> cigarettes. This would result in a new public health issue that policymakers should avoid. <br /> Study No. 1: University of Memphis School of Public Health, Science Direct-Addictive Behavior <br /> Reports (June 2020): The first study, funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse of the National <br /> Institutes of Health, investigated the impact of the City of San Francisco flavored tobacco ban ordinance <br /> after the ban was in force for nearly a year, finding that flavored tobacco product use was reduced, <br /> but cigarette smoking among 18-24 year-olds increased by over 35%. The study also found that most <br /> consumers of flavored tobacco find other sources for these products. <br /> Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853220300134?via%3Dihub <br /> Study No. 2: Yale School of Public Health Study, JAMA Pediatrics (May 2021): The second study <br /> regarding San Francisco's flavored tobacco ban ordinance was funded by the National Institute on Drug <br /> Abuse of the National Institutes of Health and the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco <br /> Products and conducted by the Yale School of Public Health. It compared youth smoking rates among high <br /> National Association of Tobacco Outlets,Inc.,17595 Kenwood Trail,Minneapolis,MN 55044 952-683-9270 <br /> www.natocentral.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.