My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #32
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
01/18/2022 Regular & Special SA
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #32
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2022 5:23:32 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 11:43:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
1/18/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE <br /> S�tY Op <br /> �k Y <br /> BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO j r SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ <br /> "1868 <br /> Dept. of Health, Society, and Behavior <br /> Dept. of Chicano/Latino Studies <br /> 653 E. Peltason Drive,AIRB 2026 <br /> Irvine, CA 92697 <br /> December 7, 2021 <br /> RE: General Plan Process and Content <br /> Dear Santa Ana City Council Members, <br /> I write in my role as a founding member of the iPlo-NO Santa Ana! Lead-Free Santa Ana! Community- <br /> Academic Partnership to understand and address resident-driven concerns about lead in the environment. In <br /> this role, we have developed a robust sampling and analysis process, and have thoughtfully engaged residents <br /> of Santa Ana to better understand their concerns. I write to ask that the Mayor and City Council vote to delay <br /> adoption of the General Plan Update and the EIR, to take the time to adopt specific commitments to <br /> remediating environmental injustices in Santa Ana, and to implement a community review and approval <br /> process for each component in the General Plan prior to approval by City Council. <br /> We believe that the current soil-lead policies in particular are insufficient,because: 1) there are no provisions <br /> for the city to engage in soil-lead testing in residential neighborhoods, and no clear process or agreed upon <br /> safety thresholds for identifying lead-contaminated properties; 2) while Implementation Action 2.4 of the <br /> Safety Element expresses a commitment to working with our organization to understand the prevalence of <br /> environmental lead contamination in Santa Ana and to proposing solutions and measurements of effectiveness, <br /> there is not an actual expressed commitment to remediating the lead, and the timeline limits the action to 2022- <br /> -with a problem as widespread as soil-lead contamination, one year is not enough time to effectively address <br /> the crisis; and 3)there is no commitment to collaborating with the Orange County Health Care Agency to <br /> provide health care for undocumented and uninsured residents living in neighborhoods impacted by soil-lead <br /> contamination. <br /> In the long-term, we would like the city to create an Environmental Justice Enforcement Agency, with staff <br /> trained to document and investigate community concerns about potential environmental injustices,meet <br /> quarterly with community stakeholders (like OCEJ, MPNA, Thrive Santa Ana, Santa Ana Active Streets <br /> Coalition, and Rise Up Willowick)to determine best practices for addressing environmental injustices, and to <br /> provide residents with regular reports on their work and local environmental health issues they have <br /> identified. <br /> Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need further clarification. My contact information is <br /> below. <br /> Alana M.W. LeBr6n,PhD, MS Email aJ ra. i((i L c Il.edu <br /> University of California,Irvine, Phone: (617)733-7963 <br /> Department of Health, Society, and Behavior Fax: (949) 824-1019 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.