My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #32
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
01/18/2022 Regular & Special SA
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #32
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2022 5:23:32 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 11:43:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
1/18/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UCI Community Resilience <br /> However,both of these attempts came up short. Our partners in iPlo-NO! Santa Ana! reported that very <br /> few of the solutions proposed during the meetings were incorporated into the General Plan and concerns <br /> around the survey design were not addressed in the final version that was disseminated to Santa Ana <br /> residents. Ultimately,the survey suffered from poor results, receiving only 746 responses. This number <br /> does not constitute an accurate assessment of Santa Ana communities' environmental justice needs. <br /> Simply put: a survey that engages only 0.2%of residents is not good enough. <br /> iPlo-NO! Santa Ana!,along with many other residents and community stakeholders,believe that a more <br /> thorough community engagement process is needed to better inform the update to the City's General <br /> Plan. <br /> In order to ensure that the final version of the General Plan genuinely reflects the perspectives and needs <br /> of Santa Ana residents and expert community stakeholders, it is imperative that the City participate in an <br /> additional series of roundtable discussions with impacted residents and community groups such as iPlo- <br /> NO! Santa Ana!, in order to confirm their approval of the current policy language and incorporate any <br /> pending resident concerns. <br /> For these reasons,I ask you to vote to delay the adoption of the Final Recirculated Program <br /> Environmental Impact Report No.2020-03 and General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 for Santa <br /> Ana General Plan Update. <br /> The City must take the time to engage with impacted communities to adopt specific commitments to <br /> remediating the soil-lead crisis and other environmental injustices in Santa Ana, and to implement a <br /> community review and approval process for each component in the General Plan prior to approval by the <br /> City Council. <br /> As one of the six Guiding Principles of the City of Santa Ana's Five-Year Strategic Plan, equity must not <br /> be forgotten in the General Plan process. <br /> Thank you for your time and consideration. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> ?'-af7��J <br /> Gregory Lopez <br /> Project Manager <br /> Community Resilience Projects <br /> University of California, Irvine <br /> cc: Abigail Reyes, Director Community Resilience Projects,University of California, Irvine <br /> 2 <br /> Ma61 ing ddirass: c/o U II II...a r, 401. Il::::ast Il::�aftasoirn II)irve, 3u. to 1.000, Ilirv6ine, CA 92697 1.000 <br /> I::�hys6call ddirass: 3u irnirneir 3ass6oirn I13' (13uH6irng 230), 3u. to 1.1.0, umU ll, Ilia ine CA 92697 <br /> ( 4 ) 324 2489coirriirriu ini tyiras61l6eirnce.uc6.edu <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.