Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Penaloza expressed concern with draft map A2. Requested to <br />keep downtown district together. Asked consultant to keep together the business <br />districts, and keep in mind that new apartment units that will change the population <br />in those areas. Asked consultant to consider the Transit Zoning Code and keep in <br />mind the entire area east of Main Street. <br />Redistricting Partners consultant Paul Mitchell explained his staff w,1 jalancing <br />data in each map as an option, and the chosen trade-offs, such a ,King for a map <br />to be redrafted with certain amendments. Noted in map A2, the ntown area is not <br />split, it might be disconnected from other neighborhoods tha' -)nsider <br />themselves part of the greater downtown neighborhood. <br />Councilmember Phan expressed the following maps ' , elevated: 775, '7567, <br />87613, 86566, and two maps recently submitted bl alition that have As. <br />plurality district along with draft map A2, which al .as an Asian plurality di, ` In <br />addition, inquired about, the prison populatior <br />Redistricting Partners consultant Paul MitchL 'grified f' .ise of the Citizen Voting <br />Age Population (CVAP) and the prison popula,. -1d% aent data (PPA). Noted <br />that it is required by law that the top data set, kno� point data or moment in time <br />for the decennial census that is used to determine t,, 'gig each of your wards are, is <br />always going to be the prison ar' data set. The tL -,ta set will always be the <br />PPA data. It has to be by law bG o pair Maps Ac,. <br />Councilmember Phan requested L iclude r ,howing the communities, <br />such as the Sullivan community ar. :outs )ast tvio.. Community, to be included <br />on the maps reque-' ' ,hove. <br />Redistricting ' ,ners coi Itant Paul `chell clarified that all maps need to be <br />kept for thF xt ten years Dwever, as 'uested will elevate maps that meet the <br />Asian pl, (y. Thus, no' to retain A2, E, and three additional maps mentioned <br />by Counc.. tuber Ph -'-,/ i, they meet the criteria and give them <br />lettered des. fior , the nen, .. ig. Councilmember Phan also requested to <br />review the Sa. . Coalition maps to be elevated if they meet the criteria. <br />.wayo► . 'em Be,- , asked that data for 86566 be clarified. <br />The redistrict, matter v..i be placed on subsequent agendas to be discussed at 7 <br />p.m. at upcorr, council meetings. <br />4ayor Sarmir ) closed the public hearing at 9:13 p.m. <br />At,. r , council took items 32 and 8 out of order followed by item 4. <br />32. Public Hearing - Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020- <br />03 and General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 for Santa Ana General Plan Update <br />Legal Notice published in the Orange County Reporter on November 26, 2021 and <br />notices mailed on November 19, 2021. <br />City Council 2T — 21 irV2022 <br />