My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MARK WALDO V CITY OF SANTA ANA
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
M
>
MARK WALDO V CITY OF SANTA ANA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2022 2:57:21 PM
Creation date
2/14/2022 2:55:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
MARK WALDO V CITY OF SANTA ANA
Contract #
A-2022-017
Agency
City Attorney's Office
Council Approval Date
1/18/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INSURANCE NOT REQUIRED <br />WORK MAY PROCEED A-2022-017 <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL <br />DATE: <br />SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIM FOR ATTORNEY FEES <br />D.GA��SWZcgE Ua;r� iSAND �COSTS UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6259(d) <br />This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claim for Attorney Fees and Costs Under <br />Government Code section 6259(d) ("Agreement") is made and entered into solely by and between <br />o BRIAN HEIDER ("Defendant," "Cross -Complainant," "Cross -Petitioner" or "HEIDER"), and <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA ("Defendant/Respondent," "Cross -Defendant," "Cross -Respondent" or <br />d' "CITY"). <br />RECITALS: <br />y <br />WHEREAS, MARK WALDO ('Petitioner," 'Plaintiff," "Cross -Defendant" or <br />"WALDO" herein) filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate ("Writ') and Complaint for Declaratory <br />Relief against CITY and HEIDER in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of <br />Orange, Central Justice Center District ("Court") known as MARK WALDO v. CITY OF <br />SANTA ANA, BRIAN HEIDER, and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Case No. 30-2019-01120806-CU- <br />WM-CJC (the "Action") seeking to prevent the City from disclosing certain records to <br />HEIDER requested under the California Public Records Act. <br />WHEREAS, HEIDER filed a Cross -Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Cross -Petition <br />for Writ of Mandate against WALDO and CITY in the Action seeking a writ under Government <br />Code section 6258 commanding CITY to disclose the certain records HEIDER requested. <br />WHEREAS, on June 24, 2021, the Court granted Heider's cross -petition for a writ of <br />mandate against CITY and ordered the City to produce certain records requested by HEIDER <br />pursuant to his California Public Records Act request in the Action. <br />WHEREAS, on or about October 8, 2021, HEIDER, through his attorney of record, <br />brought a Motion for Attorney Fees in the Action against CITY under Government Code section <br />6259(d) and against WALDO under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. <br />WHEREAS, CITY and HEIDER (collectively, the "Parties"), desire to settle fully and <br />finally HEIDER's claim in the Action only for attorney fees and costs under Government Code <br />section 6259(d) against CITY. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the Parties as follows: <br />1. Each party will exchange a fully signed executed copy or original of this <br />Agreement. HEIDER's counsel, Robert Lucas Law PC, agrees to provide a W-9 to CITY for <br />processing of settlement payment. CITY cannot proceed with processing payment without a fully <br />executed copy of this Agreement and a W-9 from HEIDER's counsel, Robert Lucas Law PC. <br />2. The Parties agree to settle HEIDER's Motion for Attorney Fees under Government <br />Code section 6259(d) against CITY on the following terms: <br />a. Without taking HEIDER's pending Motion for Attorney Fees off -calendar or <br />withdrawing the Motion entirely, HEIDER agrees to file with the Superior Court in this <br />Action a Notice of Partial Withdrawal of Motion for Attorney Fees ("Withdrawal <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.