My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #1
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
03/07/2022 Special
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2022 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
3/7/2022 9:38:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
3/7/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Latino Health Access <br /> LATINO 450 W. Fourth Street, Suite 130 <br /> HEALTH Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> ACCESS WN 714-542-7792 <br /> www.latinohealthaccess.org <br /> mobile home parks, and shared environmental justice concerns in District D, and low-income, mixed <br /> immigration status households facing environmental justice issues in District F. District D keeps the <br /> Sullivan Community and District F keeps the Delhi neighborhood intact. The configuration of SARC la <br /> and SARC 2a do differ when it comes to District E and C. In SARC la, the Central, Mid-City, and <br /> Pico-Lowell communities are kept together in District E, where the majority of residents in those <br /> communities are Low-income monolingual Spanish speakers. In SARC la, the SARC drew a <br /> configuration to uphold the input of residents in the southern district in Santa Ana, which tends to be <br /> affluent residents. District C and E in the SARC 2a configuration were primarily drawn in an effort to <br /> maintain contiguity and compact districts. The proposed maps by the SARC accurately represent and <br /> thoughtfully consider the needs, concerns, and demands of low-income communities of color and <br /> working families, the heart of Santa Ana. <br /> On the other hand, the submitted Plan F and Plan K go against the culmination and collective effort of 6 <br /> months of engagement by community residents throughout the City of Santa Ana. Plan F and Plan K fail <br /> to acknowledge and respect the communities of interest of low-income communities of color and working <br /> families. Instead, Plan F and Plan K uphold the interest and demands of affluent families in southern and <br /> northern Santa Ana neighborhoods. Both plans divide the Sullivan community, divide the environmental <br /> justice corridor East of Main Street, and place the Delhi Community with the South Coast Metro area, <br /> diluting the voting power of low-income residents. Many residents from the southern Santa Ana <br /> neighborhoods have expressed their interest in maintaining a southern district, and to respect that, SARC <br /> la maintains a southern district, without sacrificing other neighborhoods and communities of interest like <br /> Plan F and K do. <br /> The effects of the map that is adopted will be felt by our city's residents for the next ten years. In order to <br /> uphold the City's value of equity and make certain that residents that have been suffering the <br /> consequences of political disinvestment are represented, we urge you to not consider Plan F and Plan K <br /> and instead consider one of the two maps proposed by the Santa Ana Redistricting Coalition. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Nancy Mejia, MPH, MSW <br /> Chief Program Officer <br /> nmejia2latinohealthaccess.org <br /> PREVENTION EDUCATION ACTION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.