My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2022-03-15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
03/15/2022 Regular
>
Agenda Packet_2022-03-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2022 12:29:18 PM
Creation date
3/14/2022 12:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/15/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This Business Item - Agreement No. 2022-029 was approved. <br />Moved by Councilmember Penaloza, seconded by Councilmember Mendoza <br />to Approve. <br />YES: 7 — Hernandez, Lopez, Mendoza, Penaloza, Phan, Bacerra, S, .�ento <br />NO: 0 <br />ABSTAIN: 0 <br />ABSENT:0 <br />Status: 7-0-0-0— Pass <br />25. Adopt Ordinance No. NS-XXXX — ZONING ORDIN " .;E AMENDMENT , 2021- <br />03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or iE CITY OF SANTA ANt-, <br />REPEALING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENT . iY ARTICI ^ XVIII.I. OF CHAP (ER <br />41 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODL-GARDINr iE HOUSING <br />OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE <br />First reading at the November 16, 2021 City Counu. Feting and approved by a vote <br />of 4-2 (Mendoza, Penaloza dissF -4 and Bacerra at, -led). <br />Published in the Orange County � -)orLu. I 'nvember 2.- 121. <br />Continued from the December 7, 2, 1, DecF -')?1 and January 18, 2022 <br />City Council meetings. <br />MINUTES: Cormem han rec ?d herself from item 25 due to a conflict of <br />interest and r an abund e of cauti(- <br />Councilmel, - Baceid Item 25. <br />*1if6'rn1ia <br />"` ey Ca►r 'o addressed council regarding SA City Charter Section 4-10 <br />,ajority '�e full membership of the council which is consistent with the <br />rnmet,. de 36936. Thus, four affirmative votes of the majority of <br />the full memo 'yip of tr, ouncil are needed to pass the ordinance. <br />City Attorney C� ilho addressed council regarding a recusal versus an abstention. <br />L. ,cilmeml, _opez requested City Attorney Carvalho provide sample language <br />for, `-,an, agarding abstentions counting towards the majority vote. <br />No action, taken as vote failed. <br />Mayor Sarmiento inquired if item would be brought back as a first reading or second <br />reading after FPPC has opined. <br />City Attorney Carvalho noted there was no action as the vote failed tonight and <br />provided council with options. Addressed council's various questions. <br />City Council S— 13 3/15/2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.