My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE- #04
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
03/15/2022 Regular
>
CORRESPONDENCE- #04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2022 11:44:25 AM
Creation date
3/17/2022 7:57:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
3/15/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Middleton, Samuel <br />From: Dana Jazayeri <dj@shopunlisted.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 2:40 PM <br />To: eComment; Sarmiento, Vicente; Phan, Thai; Penaloza, David; Lopez, Jessie; Bacerra, <br />Phil; Mendoza, Nelida; Hernandez, Johnathan; Morris, Angie; Ridge, Kristine; Mendoza, <br />Steven; johnathan@hernandezforsantaana.org <br />Subject: OC Streetcar Project — Orange County Transportation Authority Statement <br />Esteemed Mayor and City Councilmembers, <br />My name is Dana Jazayeri, and I am the owner of Marcas Gallery/Unlisted Located at 305 E 4t' St. # 104, between Spurgeon and French. And I am a <br />resident residing in Heninger Park. I have felt the impact as a business owner and resident caused by the OC Streetcar project. Financially, my <br />business is operating at a 30% loss as of this date compared to years past. My commute to work from my business to residence during rush hour <br />times has increased 500%. One day on a Wednesday it took me 40 mins to navigate the consistently changing roadways, that is a 0.7-mile car ride. If <br />I as a resident who navigates these streets daily has issues getting through the downtown, I can only imagine the issues non-residents have. My <br />complaint today has a few points. Care should be made to mitigate the negative impact to the customers. By customers I mean any commuting <br />resident or non-resident attempting access to the downtown or passing through it. The customer experience is an important factor. The negative <br />experience will live past the completion of the streetcar project, and it may take years to bring those impacted by the project back to the downtown. I <br />feel for my residents who have added commute times. These added times equate to money losses in gas and maintenance. Let alone the loss of <br />quality time with their families. I have immense sympathy for any non-resident attempting to access the downtown to interact with the businesses and <br />services as they are the least knowledgeable about the area. <br />The on -street and detour signage are abysmal. We were promised proper wayfinding signage so customers who have victoriously arrived to one of <br />the parking structures, could locate the businesses effectively. What they are presented with is a confusing unnavigable landscape that changes daily. <br />Signage promoting the project continues to be placed through out the downtown and it provides no substance. Customers are not here to gawk over <br />this project. They are here to interact with the downtown sector in some way and they should be provided with proper wayfnding signage. We were <br />promised proper detour signs. And we received the same run of the mill detour signs that are small and detour you to nothing specific. Example, the <br />one way at 5t' St. and French St. I have nearly been in a head on collision as drivers are confused about where to go. Ultimately, OCTA has shown <br />little care to how this project plays out. It's clear Utilitarianism. OCTA is not a stakeholder here and they are showing it. City representatives are the <br />stake holders, and they are the ones who were to sit down prior to this project and discuss how to mitigate business losses and lessen the <br />customer/community impact of this project. OCTA is clearly not qualified or aware on how to execute this project properly. <br />I have spoken with representatives at the Federal Transportation Bureau and the mitigation conversation was to occur at the Local Level. The cities <br />representatives should of began the dialogue with OCTA to organize a mitigation program to minimize impact caused to its residents and acquire <br />funding for businesses impacted. Only after businesses and residents voiced themselves about this failure have conversations started. As I appreciate <br />the opportunity to receive a grant to support the impact I have received the amount is not enough. The FTB representative provided me with an <br />example of a proper mitigation program organized by the city of Los Angeles and LA Metro. Through local (Measure M), state and federal funding <br />their Business Interruption Fund or BIF has a $10,000,000 reserve to assist "small mom and pop" businesses with less than 25 employees along the <br />purple line construction route, a similar project to the OC Streetcar. The fund provides up to $50,000 or 60% of annual business revenue losses per <br />business. Multiple requests for financial assistance can be made during the duration of the construction project. <br />The city and OCTA need to work together to find the proper funding to mitigate the impact of this project and correct the current signage issues. If <br />the current investors cannot survive the duration of this project and benefit from its completion this project will be built upon a financial graveyard. <br />Thank you for your time in reading my statement. <br />Dana Jazayeri <br />If you wish to learn more about the LA Metro BIF please follow the link below. <br />htlps://www.metro.net/about/business-interruption-fund/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.