My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #38
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
04/05/2022 Special and Regular & HA
>
Correspondence - #38
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2022 4:31:55 PM
Creation date
4/4/2022 4:38:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
4/5/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AHRI <br /> FOR JUSTICE <br /> independent from the Police Department and that the City Attorney's office does not encounter <br /> any conflicts of interest. <br /> In order to be effective, the Board/Commission must not only be independent, but it must also <br /> have the authority to receive, investigate, and make findings of fact regarding all incidents and <br /> practices of the Police Department. Because the Board/Commission cannot rely on the Police <br /> Department alone to investigate officer-involved deaths, the Board/Commission must have <br /> the authority to respond to the scene of critical incidents, including police uses of deadly <br /> force. Another core component of efficacy is the authority to make binding findings of fact; <br /> mere recommendations or advisory opinions cannot change police behavior. Absent clear error, <br /> Board/Commission's findings of fact must be binding and accepted by the Police <br /> Department and Police Chief. Clear error only exists when the Board/Commission's findings <br /> of fact are based upon obvious and indisputable errors and cannot be supported by any <br /> reasonable interpretation of the evidence. <br /> We urge the Mayor and City Council to take two actions on Agenda Item 38. First, we urge the <br /> Council to direct staff to prepare an ordinance to establish the Police Oversight <br /> Board/Commission, with the support of community-based organizations, and consider the <br /> ordinance before the end of the 2021-22 Fiscal Year. Several City surveys of Santa Ana residents <br /> have shown that police oversight has broad support and the effort to establish a strong oversight <br /> model must not be delayed further. If the Council considers and approves an ordinance to <br /> establish a Board/Commission model before the end of the Fiscal Year, we can begin an <br /> implementation process that can take up to a year or longer. In order for the Board/Commission <br /> to have the powers that efficacy requires, the City Charter must be amended. The ordinance that <br /> establishes the infrastructure of an effective police oversight body can be written and passed in <br /> parallel with the efforts to amend the Charter. To that end, we also recommend that the Council <br /> direct staff to prepare a Charter amendment, to be submitted to voters at the November 2022 <br /> election, that authorizes the Board to impose discipline upon the Chief of Police and Santa Ana <br /> Police Department officers for cause. The Charter amendment should also enshrine a sustainable <br /> budget to fully fund the Board/Commission with public safety funds derived from cost-savings <br /> measures from the Police Department budget. The consideration of an ordinance and Charter <br /> amendment must happen concurrently to ensure police oversight is promptly enacted and that <br /> residents of the City of Santa Ana are empowered to remediate and prevent police violence. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Susan Cheng <br /> Organizing Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.