My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2022-05-17
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
05/17/2022 Special and Regular
>
Agenda Packet_2022-05-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2022 3:10:44 PM
Creation date
5/16/2022 2:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
5/17/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1584
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEEDS FOR IMPROVED PARK ACCESS <br />The City strives to provide parks within a 10-minute walking or biking distance of all <br />residents (approximately 1/4 to 1/2 mile). The PMP identified 43 areas that are park deficient. <br />Of these, 23 are categorized as "high needs," because they are below the poverty level, <br />have a majority non -white population, have a higher residential density, and/or are in <br />Environmental Justice Communities or Focus Areas for redevelopment. High needs areas <br />are outlined in red on the map. <br />A detailed analysis of these gap areas shows that many (shaded in yellow) have schools, <br />private or public recreation facilities, other City -owned land, or existing or planned off-street <br />trails that could help address recreation needs. The remaining areas, shaded in green, do not <br />have any similar opportunities. These are the areas where park acquisition is more critical. <br />The park service and equity analysis was part of a more extensive evaluation of acquisition <br />opportunities, since Santa Ana provides considerably less parkland than U.S. cities on <br />Note: See full map, legend, and <br />details in Chapter 4, page 83 <br />.� III • 'ihl•4{ <br />6a. I '�. <br />I'S 95Iv deg �l. F !IMP qq� <br />MS ePark •,} •i <br />j h <br />ill_-IFi <br />yk•F. UNMC ' {0 <br />M0.0.1 FAA <br />4' FxAii Park <br />FCSIIN+AIN VALLEY pyh •-. <br />`- City Council P' <br />SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN <br />14 — 16 <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit 1 <br />NEEDS FOR IMPROVED TRAIL CONNECTIVITY <br />Santa Ana residents want a more walkable, bikeable city, along with improved access to <br />parks. While the City is planning a more comprehensive bikeway system, the PMP focuses <br />on the off-street trail corridors (Class I or IV bikeways) that connect parks and support <br />recreation. <br />• Proposed Key Connections: These trails, shown in red on the map, were identified as <br />priority opportunities to enhance pedestrian and bicycle connections to local parks and <br />regional trails. Approximately 20.6 miles of trails are needed. <br />• Proposed Golden Loop Trail: When completed, the Golden Loop Trail, shown in <br />gold, will be a 17-mile multiuse path connecting the Santa Ana River corridor to other <br />destinations. Approximately 4.5 miles of trails are needed to complete the loop. <br />Note: See full map, legend, and <br />?ate <br />details in Chapter 4, page 97 <br />{i{r <br />prI <br />py� <br />�... R N <br />r <br />El Xltll <br />a <br />_ <br />, <br />hMahfr�' <br />N 4 PPYYii,• <br />Liar UB'o <br />~4'.�� .... ' Is 1r +Ti? i9} r:, <br />Err <br />ed. paeE,O r L <br />f•iI Hsi <br />Arica Pail fG <br />t ...,i .L <br />0 <br />. <br />_ <br />irr. NmwA <br />I ± <br />Peef� <br />y ` <br />i[ <br />— <br />Z . <br />-------J . rdm Park <br />�' <br />I <br />x�aaii <br />eglm rlCnrli <br />F3.4 <br />i <br />yyk��� <br />thdi <br />0 Pdr1 <br />NaePark <br />� <br />4 4P <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.