Laserfiche WebLink
Cabrillo at First Mixed-Use Residential <br /> Air Quality, Global Climate Change, HRA, and Energy Impact Analysis <br /> 44 19386 <br />A [Inhalation absorption factor] = 1 <br />EF [Exposure frequency (days/year)] = 350 <br />ED [Exposure duration (years)] = 30 for adults (for an individual who is an adult at opening year), 14 for <br />children (from 2-16 years), 14 for adults (from 16-30 years), 2 for infants, and 1 for 3rd Trimester <br />ASF [Age sensitivity factor) = 10 for 3rd trimester to 2 years of age, 3 for 2 to 16 years of age, and 1 for <br />16 to 30 years of age <br />FAH [Fraction of time spent at home] = 1 for 3rd trimester to 2 years of age, 1 for 2 to 16 years of age, <br />and 0.73 for 16 to 30 years of age <br />106 [Micrograms to milligrams conversion] <br />AT [Average time period over which exposure is averaged in days] = 25,550 <br /> <br />There currently is no SCAQMD TAC threshold for “existing” cancer risk to sensitive receptors. The SCAQMD <br />TAC threshold of 10 in one million is defined as the “maximum incremental cancer risk” (MICR). As the project <br />does not involve the construction of sources that would significantly contribute to “incremental cancer risk,” <br />the application of the 10 in one million threshold is not well applied in this case. Other air quality districts <br />have refined methodology and thresholds for evaluation of the health risks posed by heavily traveled roadways <br />and freeways to adjacent receptors. For example, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District has a <br />“Roadway Screening Analysis” procedure and thresholds based on annual average daily traffic (AADT) and <br />distance from the source. The San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District has a requirement that new land <br />use projects that will place sensitive receptors (e.g., residential units) in close proximity to existing toxics <br />sources (e.g., freeway) must not exceed the CEQA health risk threshold of 89 in a million. <br /> <br />The AERMOD model run results are shown in Appendix C. Figure 5 illustrates the cancer risk to the most <br />affected age-group, infants (0-2 years). <br /> <br />Table 13 show the cancer risk for the unborn child during the 3rd trimester, Table 14 shows the cancer risk <br />to infants (0-2 years), Table 15 shows the cancer risk to children ages 2 to 16 years and Table 16 shows the <br />cancer risk as that child becomes an adult (years 16-30). The highest cancer risk corresponds to infants 0-2 <br />years (see Table 14). As shown in Table 14, all the infant receptors within the project site are exposed to <br />cancer risks in excess of SCAQMD MICR threshold of 10 in a million, with the highest cancer risk at units <br />closest to the 5 freeway, with a maximum cancer risk of 38.46 in one million at receptor 2. The same holds <br />true for child (2-16 years) cancer risk, every child receptor within the project site is exposed to a cancer risk <br />in excess of 10 in a million; with a maximum risk of 32.57 in one million at receptor 2. Therefore, infants and <br />children will be exposed to cancer risks in excess of 10 in a million from freeway-related DPM sources. <br /> <br />The assessment of cancer-related health risk to proposed sensitive receptors is based on the following most- <br />conservative scenario: An unborn child in its 3rd trimester is potentially exposed to DPM emissions (via <br />exposure of the mother) during the opening year. That child is born opening year and then remains at home <br />for the entire first two years of life. From age 2 to 16, the child remains at home 100 percent of the time. <br />From age 16 to 30, the child continues to live at home, growing into an adult that spends 73 percent of its <br />time at home and lives there until age 30. <br /> <br />Based on the above, ultra-conservative assumptions, the 30.25-year, cumulative carcinogenic health risk (3rd <br />trimester [-0.25 to 0 years] + infant [0-2 years] + child [2-16 years] + adult [16-30 years]) to an individual <br />born during the opening year of the project, and located in the project vicinity for the entire 30-year duration, <br />is a maximum of 75.77 in a million at receptor location 2, as shown in Table 17. Furthermore, as shown in <br />Table 17, every receptor on-site would be exposed to a 30.25-year, cumulative carcinogenic health risk in <br />excess of the SCAQMD MICR threshold of 10 in a million, with the lowest risk (31.72 in a million) being at <br />receptor locations furthest from the I-5 freeway. Therefore, the on-going operations of the proposed project <br />could result in a significant impact due to the cancer risk from diesel emissions to the proposed project. <br /> <br />As the cancer risk exceeds the SCAQMD MICR threshold of 10 in a million, mitigation is required. Mitigation <br />requiring minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) 13 filters would remove a substantial amount of <br />particulates, including DPM. MERV 13 filters have a particle size removal efficiency rating of greater than 90 <br />446/27/2022 <br />Planning Commission 2 –97