Laserfiche WebLink
Cabrillo at First Mixed-Use Residential <br /> Air Quality, Global Climate Change, HRA, and Energy Impact Analysis <br /> 61 19386 <br />GREENHOUSE GAS STANDARDS AND REGULATION <br /> <br />International <br /> <br />Montreal Protocol <br /> <br />In 1988, the United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to evaluate <br />the impacts of global climate change and to develop strategies that nations could implement to curtail global <br />climate change. In 1992, the United States joined other countries around the world in signing the United <br />Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreement with the goal of controlling GHG <br />emissions. As a result, the Climate Change Action Plan was developed to address the reduction of GHGs in <br />the United States. The plan consists of more than 50 voluntary programs. <br /> <br />Additionally, the Montreal Protocol was originally signed in 1987 and substantially amended in 1990 and <br />1992. The Montreal Protocol stipulates that the production and consumption of compounds that deplete <br />ozone in the stratosphere—CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform—were to be phased <br />out, with the first three by the year 2000 and methyl chloroform by 2005. <br /> <br />The Paris Agreement <br /> <br />The Paris Agreement became effective on November 4, 2016. Thirty days after this date at least 55 Parties <br />to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Convention), accounting in total for at least <br />an estimated 55 % of the total global greenhouse gas emissions, had deposited their instruments of ratification, <br />acceptance, approval or accession with the Depositary. <br /> <br />The Paris Agreement built upon the Convention and – for the first time – attempted to bring all nations into <br />a common cause to undertake ambitious efforts to combat climate change and adapt to its effects, with <br />enhanced support to assist developing countries to do so. As such, it charts a new course in the global climate <br />effort. <br /> <br />The Paris Agreement’s central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by <br />keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to <br />pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Additionally, the <br />agreement aims to strengthen the ability of countries to deal with the impacts of climate change. To reach <br />these ambitious goals, appropriate financial flows, a new technology framework and an enhanced capacity <br />building framework will be put in place, thus supporting action by developing countries and the most <br />vulnerable countries, in line with their own national objectives. The Agreement also provides for enhanced <br />transparency of action and support through a more robust transparency framework. <br /> <br />Federal <br /> <br />The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is responsible for implementing federal policy <br />to address GHGs. The federal government administers a wide array of public-private partnerships to reduce <br />the GHG intensity generated in the United States. These programs focus on energy efficiency, renewable <br />energy, methane and other non-CO2 gases, agricultural practices, and implementation of technologies to <br />achieve GHG reductions. The USEPA implements numerous voluntary programs that contribute to the <br />reduction of GHG emissions. These programs (e.g., the ENERGY STAR labeling system for energy-efficient <br />products) play a significant role in encouraging voluntary reductions from large corporations, consumers, <br />industrial and commercial buildings, and many major industrial sectors. <br /> <br />In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (Docket No. 05–1120), argued November 29, 2006 <br />and decided April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held that not only did the EPA have authority to regulate <br />greenhouse gases, but the EPA's reasons for not regulating this area did not fit the statutory requirements. As <br />616/27/2022 <br />Planning Commission 2 –114