Laserfiche WebLink
SPR No. 2022-03, TTM No. 2022-02, and DBA No. 2022-02 – Cabrillo Crossing <br />June 27, 2022 <br />Page 5 <br />2 <br />7 <br />4 <br />1 <br />Density Bonus Agreement <br />In addition, Section 41-1607 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires an application for <br />a density bonus agreement containing “deviations” (incentives/concessions and/or <br />waivers) to be approved by the Planning Commission. The following subsections analyze <br />the applicant’s request for both the Site Plan Review and the Density Bonus Agreement <br />applications. <br />The MEMU regulating plan requires that publicly-accessible open space be provided <br />along main street-facing façades. Because the project has frontage on only one street, <br />meeting this requirement would result in the building being pushed back significantly from <br />First Street and would render almost the first 1/4 of the site’s depth unusable for building <br />area, resulting in the developer reducing the number of unit or reducing the square <br />footage for private or common open space area. Moreover, in order to maintain the <br />current proposed unit count, the developer would be required to construct additional <br />levels, resulting in a different type of construction (steel-frame/Type I versus wood/Type <br />III), further increasing development costs. If the publically accessible open space <br />standard were applied as written, the result would be a significant loss of units and parking <br />area. Pushing the building back would also reduce the contribution to creating a more <br />urban, walkable environment. The Applicant intends to compensate for this reduction by <br />designing the community so that each unit contains ample onsite private open space and <br />by providing a commercial component along First Street that will activate the street <br />frontage. <br />When analyzed cumulatively, the requested concession could be avoided if the project <br />were constructed using a different site plan and building type. If the project were designed <br />with a multi-level parking and/or subterranean parking structure, or if the applicant used <br />different building materials (non-combustible, Type I) to construct a taller project, <br />additional area on site would become available to provide the publicly-accessible open <br />space. However, these changes would increase development costs, resulting in the <br />affordable housing project becoming financially infeasible due to the significantly- <br />increased financial implications of using Type I construction. <br />Tentative Tract Map <br />Subdivision requests are governed by Chapter 34 and Chapter 41 of the SAMC. Pursuant <br />to Section 66473.5 and 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act, applications for <br />tentative tract maps are approved when it can be shown that findings can be made in <br />support of the request. <br />Specifically, findings related to the proposal need to be made that find the project is <br />consistent with the General Plan, the site is physically suitable for the type and density of <br />the proposed project, the proposed project will not cause substantial environmental <br />damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat, the proposed <br />6/27/2022 <br />Planning Commission 2 –5