Laserfiche WebLink
Proposal for CEQA Analysis <br />Garry Avenue Business Park <br />July 26, 2021 <br />(3) new information of substantial importance; which was not known or could not have been known shows <br />the project will do any of the following: (a) have one or more significant effects not discussed in the <br />previous EIR; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown <br />in the previous EIR; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would <br />in fact be feasible, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measure; or (d) <br />mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would , <br />substantially reduce the effects, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure. <br />Preparation of an Initial Study will allow for a determination on whether any of the conditions listed in <br />Section 15162 exist for the proposed project, which would require an SEIR. The fact that new information of <br />substantial importance is available or that the project is now more specifically defined does not establish <br />that an SEIR is required. It is only required if this new information or project modification would also result in <br />significant environmental impacts. Another consideration for preparing an SEIR or other CEQA compliance <br />document in lieu of an Addendum is if there is potential controversy related to the project, which would <br />demand public review and comment about the environmental impacts of the project. <br />2.) Initial Study/Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Under this scenario, the project would include a GPA and ZC along with the DPR. EPD would prepare an <br />Initial Study based on the technical studies prepared by the applicant after reviewing the technical studies <br />for CEQA adequacy and preparing additional studies that have not been completed by the applicant. The <br />Initial Study would determine if an ND, MIND or EIR is required. EPD assumes an ND or MIND in this case <br />based on the understanding that the technical studies prepared to -date and the remaining studies have not <br />and will not identify any significant and unavoidable impacts. If any studies determine that a significant and <br />unavoidable impact(s) will occur, an EIR will be prepared. However, this is not expected based on the results <br />of the studies prepared by the applicant. <br />Per your request, the following scope of work is based on scenarios l.c) and 2.) for scope definition and <br />discussion purposes; however, we can amend the scope to accommodate another document type if further <br />discussion yields a different approach is preferred, including those listed above or a combination of several <br />approaches. <br />