My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. (2)
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
E
>
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2023 1:52:18 PM
Creation date
7/18/2022 8:11:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Contract #
A-2020-241-15-01
Agency
Planning & Building
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposal for CEQA Analysis July 26, 2021 <br />Gamy Avenue Business Park Page 8 <br />3. Environmental Documentation - Initial Study/Section 15183 Streamlining <br />3.1. Administrative Draft Initial Study <br />As discussed above, EPD assumes the project will be proceeding after the City completes the public drafts <br />of the GPU and EIR. Therefore, the CEQA compliance approach will be to tier off of that EIR in which it will <br />qualify for CEQA review under Section 15183 of the California Code of Regulations, which stipulates that <br />if a project is consistent with the land use and zoning of an adopted General Plan, CEQA "shall not require <br />additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project - <br />specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site." <br />Completing the analysis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 would focus the effort on a narrow <br />range of potentially significant impacts, including those which: <br />• Are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located; <br />• Were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the Zoning Action, General Plan or <br />community plan with which the project is consistent; <br />• Are potentially significant off -site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the <br />prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action; <br />• Are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which <br />was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse <br />impact than discussed in the prior EIR. <br />To evaluate the project pursuant to the above, EPD will prepare an IS for the project addressing each of the <br />environmental topics and through this effort evaluate the applicability of Section 15183 to the project. <br />An administrative draft of the IS will be provided to the City for review. City comments will be incorporated <br />into an updated document. One round of review is expected. <br />3.2. Public Draft IS/Section 15183 Streamlining and MMRP <br />Section 15183 does not require a public circulation of the tiering document, but in preparation for the <br />hearing body's staff report packages, EPD will prepare the final public draft IS/Section 15183 Streamlining <br />document, including revisions that may be necessary after the Planning Commission meeting, including <br />responses to comments submitted on the CEQA document. Because the scope of changes is not known at this <br />time and until the hearing occurs, the fee associated with this task is a budget amount. <br />As part of this task, EPD will also prepare an MMRP for the project incorporating the General Plan EIR <br />mitigation measures and any project -specific measures. The MMRP will use the City's typical format for such <br />documents. EPD will review the MMRP with the to ensure the steps to compliance with each mitigation measure <br />are appropriate and feasible. <br />4. Environmental Documentation - Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />This scope of work assumes that after preparing the Task 3 efforts, the applicant will instead move forward <br />with the GPA, ZC and DPR due to delays on the City's GPU and EIR. Therefore, the IS prepared under Task <br />3 would require revisions to remove references to tiering off of the GPU EIR and instead be drafted as a <br />standalone project CEQA document and in support of an MND. EPD expects and assumes that previously <br />prepared technical studies, prior to any revisions made to account for the Task 3 approach will be adequate <br />for use in the IS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.