Laserfiche WebLink
consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use <br />Element. Goal 1 promotes a balance of land uses to address <br />community needs, which includes means of communication <br />that will be served by the facility. In addition, Goals 3 and 5 <br />require preservation of_ neighborhood character and integrity <br />as well as mitigation of the impacts of developments. The <br />mono-pine location minimizes visual impact on the area and <br />assists with the stealthing of the equipment. Further, Policy <br />2.2 encourages land uses that accommodate the City's <br />needs for services. Maintaining a cell phone provider's <br />coverage in the area adds to the services that are readily <br />available and needed for business owners, workers, visitors <br />and residents in the immediate vicinity. <br />Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) <br />and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is categorically exempt pursuant to California Code <br />of Regulations Section 15301, Existing Facilities. This exemption applies to the operation, <br />repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or <br />private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving <br />negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The project consists of the renewal of <br />a permit and minor alterations to the existing wireless communications facility with no <br />expansion of use. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2019-93 will be <br />filed for th is project. <br />Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, <br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, <br />demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether <br />legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative <br />dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and <br />such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), <br />brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, <br />departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to <br />modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the <br />City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and <br />instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or <br />concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown <br />Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision <br />Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or <br />local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a <br />court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to <br />approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing <br />the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and <br />expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. <br />City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate <br />with Applicant in the defense of the Action. <br />Resolution No. 2020-17 <br />Page 3 of 5