Laserfiche WebLink
Dale Helvig <br />Resident, Santa Ana CA 92706 <br />12. Page 26: Section 17 General Plan. Statement reads: If the goc',.. established in the pl-, are not <br />being met, the plan will be amended as nr ' " Why not take the approach of providing more <br />resources to ensure the goals can be met? Revising the plan admits defeat. <br />13. Page 42: Table 2, Housing Implementation Summary Item No. 12B. "Proactively reach out to at <br />aeast 20 owners of properties eligible for placement on the local register of historic pronQr'ioc *^ <br />Pnrnrernrnp arnhintnry lictinn rrnd nracarierrtinn of rocnrirrr, rhiring thv nlnnninn narind " Time frame <br />is by June 2029. So, the way I read this is the City will reach out to roughly 3 homes per year. Is <br />this the intent, and if so, how is a maximum of 20 homes in seven years acceptable? <br />14. Page A-2: Population Growth Table A-1, Population Growth Trends. <br />Data in column for "% Change 2020-2030" needs to be revised. Santa A should be 5.8% <br />versus 8.6%; . Santa Ana (rev.)- should be 6.7-9.0% versus 6.3-8.3%. <br />15. Page A-3: Santa Ana has one of the larger and faster growing Vietnamese -American populations <br />in the county, representing 8 percent of the city's total population. Table A-2, Race And Ethnicity <br />shows Asians make up 12.1 percent. This should be fixed. <br />16. Page A-4: Employment. The sentence i ne numuer of employed residents in Santa Ana increased <br />pet Lent from 126,100 in May 2020, to 145,100 in August 202! leaves me guessing. Is it saying <br />less than half of Santa Ana the residents are employed or less than half of Santa Ana the residents <br />work in the City of Santa Ana? I think some clarification is needed. <br />17. Page B-38: Code Enforcement. Would like to see stronger language here. The recent removal of <br />over 30 cars on a residential property took over 7 years to enforce. I would like to see stronger <br />language here. <br />18. Page B-38: Overcrowding. This paragraph provides almost zero substance to the average reader. <br />Even after reading Briseno v. City of Santa Ana, it leaves me guessing as to what the City of Sant <br />Ana considers overcrowding. This section should define overcrowding. I believe a 2-bedroom <br />unit is allowed 2 in each bedroom and one more in a living room for a total of five. Please <br />confirm. <br />19. Page C-11: LAND INVENTORY. Delete the word "allocation" in the following sentence: The <br />housing element must identify available sites in the city if the Housing Development Credit does <br />not meet or exceed the RHNA allocation.. since RHNA stands for Regional Housing Needs <br />Allocation. [Page D-11, Table D-3 has same issue]. <br />20. Page C-26: Table C-6, Summary of RHNA and Housing Sites Table. Interesting to note Site <br />rezoning is listed as iiLi vecei,u -y . <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />2022-07-18 Letter to City Council - Housing Element <br />