My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence- #26
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
09/06/2022 Special and Regular & HA & Special SA
>
Correspondence- #26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2022 2:45:33 PM
Creation date
9/6/2022 12:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/1/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
occco <br /> Discussion Item #1: Create a Rental Housing Board <br /> We support the implementation of a Rent Board. A balanced Rent Board is essential in <br /> many jurisdictions' RSO and JCEO programs including providing guidance and <br /> recommendations for enforcement and future amendments. The Rent Board must have <br /> enforcement powers to reduce instances of harassment and ensure tenants are protected <br /> under these ordinances. <br /> We recommend creating a 7-member board appointed by City Council which <br /> should include 3-4 tenants, no more than 2 landlords or persons that manage <br /> rental units, and 1-2 at large members with no financial interest. <br /> Discussion Item #2: Create a Rental Registry <br /> We support the creation of a rental registry to better enforce the ordinances and track <br /> housing patterns and violations in the City. The City must also consider expanding the <br /> rent registry beyond rental units covered under the RSO and JCEO to create a <br /> comprehensive database of rental units. This would ensure an understanding of how all <br /> rental units are managed, and any violations of state and local law, price gouging, or <br /> instances of harassment within the City. <br /> Discussion Item #3: Adopt a Rental Registry Fee <br /> We do not support the adoption of a rental registry fee that would add yet another fee on <br /> tenants that are already struggling to make ends meet. According to the SCAG's 2021 <br /> Local Housing Data, across Santa Ana's 41,200 renter households, 61.2% spend 30% or <br /> more of gross income on housing costs while 28.9% of renter households in Santa Ana <br /> spend 50% or more of gross income on housing costs'. Adding to the price increase of <br /> utilities, trash costs, water, and other items tenants are already experiencing as retaliation, <br /> another fee for families already struggling is incomprehensible. According to the <br /> National Low-Income Coalition Out of Reach Study, full-time minimum wage workers <br /> can't afford to rent anywhere in the US. In Santa Ana and surrounding areas, tenants <br /> would have to work 119 minimum wage hours to afford a two-bedroom apartment2. <br /> The rental registry fee is just that, a registration fee for those that own rental units. Rental <br /> units are structured and used as a business model and a pathway to building wealth that <br /> tenants do not benefit from. Adding a rental registry fee on tenants of any percentage is <br /> unacceptable. <br /> Discussion Item #6 Expand Compliance Activities <br /> - We support the expansion of compliance activities. As stated in the staff report, the <br /> success of the RSO and JCEO are dependent upon effective compliance with the <br /> ordinances. As mentioned above, the current absence of a clear enforcement process is <br /> allowing for inconsequential violations of the ordinances and, more importantly, abuse of <br /> Trecertified Local Housing Data Santa Ana 2021,SCAG. <br /> National Low Income Housing Coalition.Out of Reach The High Cost of Housing 2021,.01 u1 0l]�.�;�h 202 (nlrh...;yyrp <br /> Orange County Congregation Community Organization <br /> 310 W Broadway,Anaheim CA 92805 <br /> www.occcopico.org <br /> (714) 491-0771 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.