Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor and City Council Persons <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Hearing: October 4, 2022; Item: 25 <br />September 30, 2022 <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />the calculation of acceptable rates, the City will either (a) deprive landlords of the regulated <br />rates they are entitled under the authority of the California Public Utilities Commission per <br />Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 739.5, or (b) violate the rights of tenants concerning ratenraking of <br />utilities, by approving rent increases that pertain to regulated utility rates. Accordingly sub - <br />billed utilities should be excluded from the definition based on the exclusive jurisdiction of <br />the California Public Utilities Commission to set utility rates for master -meter sub -meter <br />tenants. <br />B. Section 8-3145 — Petition Process, subparagraph (a): Amend to read in relevant part: "Upon <br />the filing of a Petition, the Program Administrator shall for"'ard the Petition to the Board <br />together n,ith all relevant ir7forination submitted by the petitioner, to avoid unreasonable delay; <br />the Board may encourage additional information if it finds the submittal, on its face, lacks <br />adequate evidence, but shall not refuse to consider an application based on completeness, or <br />whether it relates to nrrrltiple properties or classes of properties, or relates to generally available <br />information such as property taxes or the consumer price index. " Our client appreciates that the <br />City has removed the inflexible "Fair Return Petition" submittal requirements and up -front fee <br />deposit that ostensibly violated the principle in cases like Birkenfeld v. Cily of Berkeley, 17 Cal. <br />3d 129, 171 (1976) as detailed in the pending litigation. <br />However, we suggest that providing an agent of the Board with the ability to refuse "incomplete" <br />application may work unreasonable delay, if a basic application shows generally applicable <br />factors that apply to multiple properties or classes of units. The application should proceed, with <br />the Board corresponding back to a prospective petitioner and encouraging additional information <br />where necessary. <br />C. Section 8-3145 — Introductory Paragraph. Add additional sentence after first sentence. <br />"NoN,ithstanding anything to the contrary in this section, the Board may adjust rent upward, in <br />a Petition on the motion of the Board, or with an incomplete Petition, or with a Petition that <br />relates to multiple properties, so long as it is based on substantial evidence; and further, may <br />approve general rental adjustments for all or any class of rental units based on generally <br />applicable factors such as property taxes. Such an adjustment ivould proceed as a Petition on <br />the motion of the Board, proved by a majority vote of the Board, and proceed through the notice <br />and hearing provisions set forth herein. " <br />D. Section 8-3145 — Petition Process, subparagraph (d)2): Amend to read: "Has failed to bring <br />the Rental Unit, excludinga Mobilehome or Mobilehome Space, into compliance with the implied <br />warranty of habitability. " Under the Mobilehome Residency Law and applicable laws relating <br />to mobilchome parks, the maintenance, repair, and upkeep of a mobilehome is the exclusive <br />responsibility of the mobilehome owner (and in fact, a Park owner cannot modify or access the <br />mobilehome). The mobilehome space, with limited exceptions, is also the responsibility of the <br />mobilehome owner. <br />E. Section 8-3145 — Petition Process, subparagraph (1): Amend to read in relevant part: "The <br />hearing officer may request the City to conduct a current building inspection, or as to <br />mobilehome parks, to contact the California Department of Housing and Community <br />Kingslev — 426 Santa Ana Ordinances <br />