My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence- #22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
10/18/2022 Special and Regular
>
Correspondence- #22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2022 2:07:44 PM
Creation date
10/18/2022 9:25:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/1/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Middleton, Samuel <br /> From: Taylor Vivanco <tvivanco1999@gmail.com> <br /> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 1:11 PM <br /> To: eComment <br /> Subject: Agenda Item 22: Police Oversight Ordinance Amendments <br /> To the City Council, Phil Bacerra, and Mayor Sarmiento, <br /> I would like to voice my concerns about the current state of the Police Oversight Ordinance and would like to <br /> request changes to make this oversight more impactful and more accountable. <br /> First, we need an oversight committee that is independent from SAPID. For those who claim to be supportive of <br /> "Law and Order," police officers must also be held up to the same standards that they hold the citizens of our <br /> city to and not be permitted to circumnavigate laws by overseeing themselves. <br /> Second, we need to broaden the scope and ability for public complaints. The current ordinance is limiting <br /> complaints but if we truly want to listen to, acknowledge, and respond to the people who are at times targeted <br /> by police who break the law or overstep the boundaries and expectations of what their role calls for, then it <br /> should be made easier to make public complaints. <br /> Third, any commission that exists should be granted access to police department records. Any commission will <br /> not be able to make a decision or recommendation without a full picture of any given incident. A commission <br /> should not have to wait months to years for a FOIA to be processed and grant access to important information <br /> necessary to make a decision. A commission should not have to hope that persons involved may volunteer <br /> themselves to speak to the commission as a witness. The commission needs access that the current oversight <br /> ordinance does not grant. <br /> Fourt,the commission should be able to make disciplinary recommendations. When the commission comes to a <br /> conclusion based on all the evidence they are able to acquire, the commission should have the authority to come <br /> to a collective agreement on the types of discipline that should be granted. <br /> Finally, the commission should be representative of the city, its demographics, have qualified members, and be <br /> more inclusive of employees of some municipal agencies. <br /> These are all common sense reforms and as a citizen of Ward 4, I would like to also voice my support for the <br /> recommendations made by Chispa and other grassroots organizations in Santa Ana calling for similar changes <br /> to the Police Oversight Ordinance. For 60 years, Santa Ana residents have been calling for true accountability <br /> and oversight and now is the time to grant that! <br /> Thank you for taking the time to read this comment and I hope that you take some of these measures for <br /> accountability into consideration, <br /> Taylor Vivanco <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.