NS-3027 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

under this section may be brought by any aggrieved person, including the City and People of the State of California. No administrative remedy need be exhausted prior to filing an action for injunctive relief pursuant to this section. (d) Affirmative Defense. A Landlord's failure to comply with any requirement of this Article may be asserted as a complete affirmative defense in an unlawful detainer or any other action brought by the Landlord to recover possession of the Rental Unit. Additionally, any attempt to recover possession of a Rental Unit in violation of this Article shall render the Landlord liable to the Tenant for damages in a civil action for wrongful eviction. The prevailing party in an action for wrongful eviction shall recover costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. (e) Public Nuisance. In addition to other penalties provided by law, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any provision of this Article shall be deemed a public nuisance and may be summarily abated as such by the City, and each day such condition continues shall constitute a new and separate offense. (f) Non -Exclusive. The remedies provided in this Article are not exclusive, and nothing in this Article shall preclude any person from seeking any other remedies, penalties or procedures provided by law, nor is exhaustion of remedies under this section a prerequisite to the assertion of any other such right. Section 4. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a "project," as defined in section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed Ordinance falls within the "common sense" CEQA" exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment." Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance No. NS-3027 Page 41 of 43