Laserfiche WebLink
to ensure the Commission is not an entity to review IA investigations or to review <br /> the PD complaint process.With this language,the Council will be giving the <br /> Commission investigatory power, as opposed to the more auditor language provided <br /> previously. <br /> Qualifications of Commissioners <br /> • The ordinance must clarify that current peace officers are not eligible for Commission <br /> membership. Nearly all investigations concerning policing are conducted by peace <br /> officers and law enforcement: SAPD IA, OCDA, and POST. The Commission must be <br /> composed entirely of civilians to ensure there is one layer of civilian-led oversight of <br /> SAPD. <br /> • Record checks shall not be required of commissioners. Record checks are an unnecessary <br /> deterrent for Commissioners who will be mandated to sign a confidentiality agreement. <br /> Furthermore,this is not a requirement for any other city commission,including the <br /> Personnel Board. <br /> Meetings <br /> e We must ensure that the Police Chiefs participation in meetings DOES NOT undermine <br /> the goal of an independent Commission and want to ensure that their participation in <br /> Commission meetings should be at the discretion of the Commission. With these <br /> changes, we want to preempt a scenario in which commission meetings are dominated by <br /> the Police Department in the form of Chief or designee participation, or that their <br /> presence leads the commission to give overwhelming deference to PD. <br /> Powers and Duties of the Police Oversight Commission <br /> • The Director must be able to compel the production of evidence and administer oaths in <br /> the administration of their duties. Moreover, the Director must deliver findings in writing <br /> to ensure clear communication with Commissioners, enabling them to carry out their <br /> duties. <br /> • When the Commission delivers a recommendation concerning policy or discipline, the <br /> City Manager and/or Police Chief must respond in writing to the Commission. The <br /> efficacy of the Commission will be measured in the amount of procedural justice that is <br /> afforded to the Commission and public. Recommendations must not begin and end with <br /> the Commission. Recommendations must be adequately considered and must enable <br /> responsive communication from SAPD and the City Manager's office. <br /> • There are several provisions that limit the Commission and Director's powers "subject to <br /> the restrictions set forth in ... Santa Ana Police Department's policies and procedures." <br /> This vague reference to SAPD policies and procedures has the potential to obstruct the <br /> duties of the Commission. For example, SAPD could enact a policy that impedes upon <br /> the Commission's responsibilities and the language of the ordinance. The Department's <br /> policies and procedures must not override this ordinance. For this reason, limiting powers <br /> subject to SAPD "policies and procedures" must be deleted from the language. <br /> • Regarding the Commission's annual report to the City Council, the public reports must <br /> capture the full work of the Commission, including policy and disciplinary <br /> recommendations and their disposition. This public reporting is essential for increasing <br /> transparency and public confidence in the Commission. <br />