My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
11/01/2022 Special and Regular
>
Correspondence - #15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2022 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
11/1/2022 11:02:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
15
Date
11/1/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The ordinance must clarify that current peace officers are not eligible for Commission <br /> membership.Nearly all investigations concerning policing are conducted by peace officers <br /> and law enforcement: SAPD IA, OCDA, and POST. The Commission must be composed <br /> entirely of civilians to ensure there is one layer of civilian-led oversight of SAPD. <br /> • Record checks shall not be required of commissioners. Record checks are an unnecessary <br /> deterrent for Commissioners who will be mandated to sign a confidentiality agreement. <br /> Furthermore, this is not a requirement for any other city commission, including the <br /> Personnel Board. <br /> Meetings <br /> 0 We must ensure that the Police Chief s participation in meetings DOES NOT undermine <br /> the goal of an independent Commission, and want to ensure that their participation in <br /> Commission meetings should be at the discretion of the Commission. With these changes, <br /> we want to preempt a scenario in which commission meetings are dominated by the Police <br /> Department in the form of Chief or designee participation, or that their presence leads the <br /> commission to give overwhelming deference to PD. <br /> Powers and Duties of the Police Oversight Commission <br /> • The Director must be able to compel the production of evidence and administer oaths in <br /> the administration of their duties. Moreover, the Director must deliver findings in writing <br /> to ensure clear communication with Commissioners, enabling them to carry out their <br /> duties. <br /> • When the Commission delivers a recommendation concerning policy or discipline,the City <br /> Manager and/or Police Chief must respond in writing to the Commission. The efficacy of <br /> the Commission will be measured in the amount of procedural justice that is afforded to <br /> the Commission and public. Recommendations must not begin and end with the <br /> Commission. Recommendations must be adequately considered and must enable <br /> responsive communication from SAPD and City Manager's office. <br /> • There are several provisions that limit the Commission and Director's powers "subject to <br /> the restrictions set forth in ... Santa Ana Police Department's policies and procedures." <br /> This vague reference to SAPD policies and procedures has the potential to obstruct the <br /> duties of the Commission. For example, SAPD could enact a policy that impedes upon the <br /> Commission's responsibilities and the language of the ordinance. The Department's <br /> policies and procedures must not override this ordinance. For this reason, limiting powers <br /> subject to SAPD "policies and procedures" must be deleted from the language. <br /> • Regarding the Commission's annual report to the City Council, the public reports must <br /> capture the full work of the Commission, including policy and disciplinary <br /> recommendations and their disposition. This public reporting is essential for increasing <br /> transparency and public confidence in the Commission. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.