Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Resolution No. 2022-XXX <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or <br />any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized <br />volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, <br />lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether legal, <br />equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute <br />resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such <br />other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively “Actions”), brought <br />against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, <br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set <br />aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or <br />any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and <br />instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or <br />concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown <br />Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision <br />Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or <br />local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a <br />court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to <br />approve the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse <br />the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the <br />course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and <br />City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. <br /> <br />Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting <br />the public hearing, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-15, as conditioned <br />in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for the project located at 2929 <br />South Halladay Street. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above- <br />referenced hearing, including but not limited to: The Request for Planning Commission <br />Action dated September 26, 2022, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public <br />testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. <br /> <br />ADOPTED this 26th day of September, 2022 by the following vote. <br />AYES: Commissioners: <br />NOES: Commissioners: <br />ABSENT: Commissioners: <br />ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: <br /> <br /> <br />Bao Pham <br />Chairperson <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />9/26/2022 <br />Planning Commission 2 – 9