My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item No. 1 Public Comment_Luthin - Melinda Luthin Law
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2022
>
9-26-22
>
Item No. 1 Public Comment_Luthin - Melinda Luthin Law
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2022 1:04:48 PM
Creation date
11/7/2022 1:04:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana Planning Commission <br />Re: Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14 <br />September 26, 2022 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />applicant of the Greenlaw Project and does not agree to the erection of any building or to any other <br />alteration to the Subject Property that would interfere with GPOPA’s property rights in the Subject <br />Property or the GPOPA Easement. <br />In written comments and at the August 22, 2022 Planning Commission meeting, GPOPA, <br />as an owner of a real property interest in the Subject Property, opposed the Greenlaw Project. <br />GPOPA also opposed the Greenlaw Project as an owner of neighboring real property. After <br />receiving our comments regarding the Greenlaw Project, the Planning Commission understood <br />that the Commission cannot approve the Greenlaw Project until or unless GPOPA reconveys the <br />GPOPA Easement back to the owner of the Subject Property. In light of this, the Planning <br />Commission approved a motion to continue deliberations on the Greenlaw Project until the next <br />Planning Commission meeting in order to provide Greenlaw Partners an opportunity to negotiate <br />with GPOPA. <br />Although Greenlaw Partners and GPOPA have been in negotiations regarding the GPOPA <br />Easement, the parties have not reached any agreement regarding it, and GPOPA remains opposed <br />to the Greenlaw Project. <br />In addition, it is our understanding that the utility and drainage easements cannot be <br />extinguished as proposed without negatively affecting my client’s and possibly other neighboring <br />properties’ ability to access utilities and to have proper drainage. <br />It is our understanding that staff has recommended that the Planning commission not <br />approve any portion of the project until or unless all interest holders of the property resolve all <br />matters regarding the Subject Property. We fully agree with staff’s recommendation and, GPOPA <br />kindly requests that the Planning Commission not approve the Greenlaw Project and that staff <br />deem the Project Applications incomplete until or unless the applicant provides the City with proof <br />that it is the record owner of all interest in the Subject Property, including the GPOPA Easement. <br />Thank you for your time and consideration. If you have any questions. please contact me <br />at 949-673-1161 or at the address indicated at the top of this letter. <br /> <br />Yours truly, <br /> <br /> Melinda M. Luthin, Esq. of <br />MELINDA LUTHIN LAW <br /> cc: Ali Pezeshkpour (apezeshkpour@santa-ana.org)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.