Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> MELINDA LUTHIN <br /> 2721 East Coast Highway suite 201 • Corona del Mar • California 92625 • P 949.673.1161 • MelindaLuthinLaw.com . <br /> <br /> October 10, 2022 <br /> <br /> Santa-Ana Planning Commissioners <br />Bao Pham (Chair) <br />Miguel Calderon (Vice-Chair) <br />Isuri S. Ramos <br />Mark McLoughlin <br />Alan Woo <br />Thomas Morrissey <br />Eric M. Alderetes. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Re: Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. <br />2022-14 for the Garry Avenue Business Park at 1700, 1720, and 1740 East <br />Garry Avenue <br /> <br /> <br />Dear Planning Commissioners: <br />I represent the Garry Plaza Office Park Association (“GPOPA”), the Association for the <br />condominium project located at 1800 and 1820 East Garry Avenue (“GPOPA Property”), which <br />is next door to the real property located at 1700, 1720, and 1740 East Garry Avenue, Assessor’s <br />Parcel number 430-171-07 (“Subject Property”). GPOPA’s members are the owners of an <br />easement over and across the existing roadways on the Subject Property for purposes of ingress to <br />and egress from the GPOPA Property (“GPOPA Easement”). I provided to you, a copy of the <br />GPOPA Easement with my previous letter dated August 22, 2022. <br />Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14 for the <br />Garry Avenue Business Park at 1700, 1720, and 1740 East Garry Avenue (“Project Applications”) <br />should not have been accepted as complete by City staff, should not have been processed by City <br />staff and should not now be before you because, among other things, the applicant is not the owner <br />of all or perhaps any interest in the property. <br />As a preliminary matter, the applications identified in the Planning Commission Agenda <br />are not in the Planning Commission agenda packet. I attempted to obtain a copy of the applications <br />but was told (incorrectly) that I would have to submit a written public records request. I went to <br />City Hall and requested to inspect the applications and was told (again, incorrectly) that I could <br />not inspect the applications. As such, I, and it appears the Planning Commission have not had the <br />opportunity to read, review or analyze the actual applications. It is elementary that the Planning <br />Commission must not approve an application that its members have not yet read. <br />