My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Packet_10-10-22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2022
>
10-10-22
>
Packet_10-10-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2022 1:11:47 PM
Creation date
11/7/2022 1:10:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2021-54). Pursuant to Public Resources Code <br />section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the Project is exempt from <br />further review. This type of exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential <br />environmental impacts of the proposed demolition of three office buildings, which total <br />105,558 square feet, and construction of a new 91,500 square foot light industrial <br />warehousing building that would accommodate two tenants, are addressed in the City of <br />Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact <br />Report (GPU EIR). A rezoning that is consistent with an adopted general plan falls <br />within this exemption. <br /> <br /> (A) As set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a), projects that are <br />“consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community <br />plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional <br />environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are <br />project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” The <br />CEQA Guidelines further state that “[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the <br />project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be <br />substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or <br />standards . . . then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the <br />basis of that impact.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c). <br /> <br /> (B) The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State <br />Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any <br />decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the <br />GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with <br />implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation <br />measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. A project is consistent with <br />the GPU if its development density is the same or less than the standard expressed for <br />the involved parcel in the general plan for which an EIR has been certified, and the <br />project complies with the density-related standards contained in that plan. CEQA <br />Guidelines section 15183(i)(2). Development density standards can include the number <br />of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), <br />and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use <br />restrictions. <br /> <br /> (C) The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-3 <br />area is M1. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including <br />warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, and wholesale businesses. The <br />Project would result in a FAR of 0.42, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, <br />which evaluated a density of 3.0 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated <br />and analyzed the impacts of this Project and identified applicable mitigation measures <br />necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable <br />mitigation measures. <br /> (D) Specifically, the Project qualifies for the exemption because the following <br />findings can be made: <br />10/10/2022 <br />Planning Commission 2 – 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.