|
AN'T"AANAS BASED IMPROVEMErq 1 , D J, s "'r, ;:z 1 cr
<br />prope�ty Owners �,Jahned A b�, surmise at cre existence of the
<br />assessment mchless the alllOLIMS bi many "cases, their 1properm raxes viiiii am �,ssess r
<br />. i e n t
<br />Mbled and W SlAne caws Wood Nl*qy assessments ment uqpAd and many mpenries were
<br />lhre�,'itened �,Jrh
<br />As more of the assessments became knmwi the protem from Mose milost affelicled lbecarnie minii,iia
<br />vocW and laudew
<br />10, in A ug n5t I „ 20 11, a noti cle For a plUW bc head ng WaS i SgUied ii Tuii eati ng the ci ty' s i intient to, niudi fy
<br />the bounidaHes for il'ie do%vntimi it C'N11D "Considermble dissenthon tock place at this headng
<br />al[eoirig rmNmanagiement issues assc)iciateid %vith Dioiioimtiov'11�111 Inic , and the mayor PTO tern dhecteld
<br />MaN to prepare a remliation �for flre lof d'ile PBID "" A seco'nd chy cmmcdmari
<br />Mcmed At any moffications to The origi�i�tal district l is car�sideried a ine", distrilo, mid cites
<br />ProPoMm 218 imen suppiml l deat position
<br />On Augil!st 1l � 210 11, a �public hearing %was �held whembi nunmarous speakers addressed fl'iie
<br />Council "The injocity- af die speakers Objected W die P13DD b0cming Mat proper procedmms
<br />%vei le not followled in its establishment, that tire assessments bleing inarlie did not pli oN ilde a
<br />pmpoNcM benefit as requimd by NKAWable %4 and requiested 11ml rhe PBID be
<br />Isemablished - Subltl cioimiriei% firom city council juernbeis rievealled a 4cll� of cansensus
<br />as to what actions W anymmid, oir shoi dld, be talcien At least three (3) of tire rnier6lluiers of d"ie &ry
<br />(,,ioi in,61 agreed Chat certMn changes thad 'to takle place, most notably a!n t[iie maiinier in NvhiA
<br />n
<br />Doilv�nto%vn Inc, orgainizied and COMMIhng the busiess of adm�ii�slefing flhie PBU), At M
<br />coundl meeting, the council gm to 01mv an ammildinent to thic boundaii y, l)f dlie PB1D
<br />On AgMSxepeisma,Mons Wookcl an met to iscuss ie,emabhshment cxf tem,trnher 1thQcunigardddiseBhiRle )PRwIDas.
<br />m�m
<br />umma
<br />unm
<br />�mm
<br />emaltHshed, whether it shoWd conti�i,irnie, a lack of nansparienc�� by Doikntmmrn Inc, and
<br />mi smariagent lent issues willi EMmintown Mc The lack of consenamra ngst the couW
<br />continued and the maner wis comimed untA Wobes 1201 l
<br />On Olotobler 3, 21011, a resohnion was hTmoduced behm the city, couniM tio disiestalthshi tire PRID
<br />ptimumn to Arricle �XX, Chapttj 11 of the Santa Ana mwinicipall c�iodie Nfiflt�ple pedfiic',vis �had
<br />been receWmd by the djr Wing fbr the Msemablishnnent, "NpecifilicaLly, the City, Clellit iiei%,eid
<br />ORIM, 1561 Ananum on ped6ons pimescing agMnst Om existenoc of the CMEI- The
<br />reSol"On "SO SMS that _dWre ale qWdons reganding the overall supplim 1'br the CHID ftic)m
<br />6e rvmah&d; ovnmi ching the me if the Qzy had not l ,ves in s!upport olftiiiie
<br />Uninlems at 90 meering included stmemen,Yfifiy-n!inie (59), signaturee requesfing
<br />chsemabhshment had been receive& and Mat the jmqued budget stfli�rn�bred by Dmvntolimn Inc
<br />was "Mmandard " The maner was agabi carrUnued undl Mmuber 7, 2011
<br />On `oviembe� 7, 201 t the Pdayar Ito Tem asked the 6ty mundl to -Wen dings up," She
<br />Mxr Vated Quite COM never appToved the Allaws or he agmement i e Sh Diom-nticnv�ii
<br />Inc Rmlhei-mai e� she snated that"'State Law has a 61BUISC for that %%as deleted
<br />Froni the Resolution that approved the Qua Ana 00nance - III modons were �made: (1) to
<br />set a pubhc hemi,ing fbl�i, the &sestablisliment of the EVID; (2) to have an adviscrylembn
<br />2011 2012 ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY Pa , ge 5
<br />
|