Laserfiche WebLink
INSURANCE NOT REQUIRED <br />Oz <br />A-ci (G- I'3 773 0- <br />WORK MAY PROCEED <br />CLERK OF THE COUNCIL <br />DATE: NOV 1 5 2D22 <br />Cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana <br />Memorandum of Understanding <br />Urban Areas Security Initiative 2021 <br />A-2021-066-09A <br />Since 2004, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through the State <br />of California's Office of Homeland Security (OHS), now known as California <br />Governor's Office of Emergency Services (CalOES), as the State Administrative <br />Agency (SAA), has designated the Cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana (hereafter <br />referred to as "the Cities") as Urban Areas and awarded each jurisdiction grants under <br />the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI). UASI Grants have been awarded yearly <br />since 2004 with each cycle having a performance period of approximately two years. <br />In the 2004 and 2005 grant cycles, DHS awarded the funds and subsequently required <br />a Homeland Security Strategy from each of the Urban Areas. Anaheim and Santa <br />Ana submitted a joint Strategy which ultimately formed the basis for Orange County's <br />overall terrorism preparedness efforts. In addition, DHS required an Initial Strategy <br />Implementation Plan (ISIP) as an overview of how the Cities planned to spend UASI <br />grant funds. The Strategy and the ISIP were approved for both grant cycles and <br />project development and implementation is on -going. <br />Starting with the 2006 grant cycle and with subsequent grant cycles, and at the <br />direction of Congress, DHS has redefined the criteria by which Homeland Security <br />funds are awarded under the UASI. In addition to population and population density, <br />DHS mandates that funds be distributed based upon risk and need. Additionally, as <br />part of the funding process, the latter grant cycles require a competitive application <br />process and the development of Investment Justifications to define how the Urban <br />Areas intend to spend requested funds. These changes make it clear that simply <br />because cities are eligible as a high -risk destination doesn't end the analysis, it begins <br />the analysis. The analysis then has to consider what needs the cities are going to <br />address with the particular investments proposed. Only when the investment is <br />justified will the money flow to the cities that are otherwise eligible. This process <br />ensures that not only is DHS allocating funding based on risk and need, but that the <br />funding is being used to build the regional critical capabilities consistent with the DHS <br />goals and the priorities. <br />3. The Cities elected to define each Urban Area broadly to include all jurisdictions in the <br />county, as well as key disciplines, such as Health, Law, Fire, Emergency Management <br />and others as defined by DHS. Thus far, the grants have been individually awarded <br />to, and managed in all respects by, each City (Anaheim and Santa Ana). The Cities <br />have collaborated with the County of Orange and all other jurisdictions to form a true <br />partnership that has garnered acclaim from DHS, OHS and Congress. The Cities <br />have formed a true partnership with all stakeholders in the county and have <br />collaborated to enhance overall preparedness levels, at all times focusing on <br />