Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Melinda Luthin and William Stevens Letters Dated December 20, 2022 <br />recently on December 19, 2022. An initial delay took place because Ms. Luthin did not provide <br />her email address on the original request form, so staff had limited means of contacting her to <br />provide the requested materials. <br />Comment 5: This comment states that the applicant Rob Mitchell is not the property owner. <br />Response 5: The submittal affidavit was signed by Rob Mitchell on behalf of Greenlaw Partners, <br />which is consistent with the information provided in the supportive documents, including the Title <br />Report and Grant Deed. <br />Comment 6: This comment states that the requested CUP may not be granted because the <br />GPOPA's members own an easement over the project site. <br />Response 6: The project site is affected by five easements, some of which will remain, others of <br />which will be quitclaimed or modified as needed. These five easements are as follow: <br />Easemrartt.Descri 4�orr' <br />Status <br />_ R0staonse <br />Abutter — Rights of ingress and <br />To remain <br />This easement allows potential access from the <br />egress to or from the street or <br />future Alton Avenue overcrossing right-of-way <br />highway abutting said land (1968) <br />along the southern edge of the project site. No <br />-- from the future Alton Avenue <br />modification is required. <br />overcrossing onto the project site <br />Southern California Edison (SCE) <br />To be <br />This easement is for SCE utilities from Garry <br />Company —for public utilities, <br />quitclaimed <br />Avenue onto the project site. It does not affect the <br />ingress and egress, and incidental <br />adjacent property, but will need to be quitclaimed <br />purposes (1974) — from Garry <br />when the project site is redeveloped with the new <br />Avenue south on the project site <br />building and resulting site plan. <br />to a junction box on the project <br />site <br />SCE — for public utilities, ingress <br />To be <br />This easement is for SCE's utilities to the buildings <br />and egress, and incidental <br />quitclaimed <br />and other areas on the project site. It does not <br />purposes (1974) — on the project <br />affect the adjacent property, but will need to be <br />site, branching into 7 directions on <br />quitclaimed when the project site is redeveloped <br />the project site to serve multiple <br />with the new building and resulting site plan. <br />buildings and onsite <br />improvements <br />Abutter —for reciprocal easement <br />To be <br />This is a private easement between the subject <br />and agreement (1977) — allowing <br />partially <br />property and adjacent property at 1800 & 1820 E. <br />cross -parcel ingress and egress <br />quitclaimed <br />Garry Avenue that allows cross -parcel ingress and <br />between the project site and the <br />egress, but the easement does not specify exactly <br />adjacent property at 1800 & 1820 <br />where the points of cross -parcel ingress and <br />E. Garry Avenue <br />egress are. The easement intends to allow each <br />property to allow usage of drive aisles to reach <br />Garry Avenue and Daimler Street. When partially <br />quitclaimed, the adjacent property will still have <br />access to Garry Avenue and Daimler Street, in full <br />accordance with City and Orange County Fire <br />Authority regulations. Modification of this easement <br />is a private matter between the two parties, but a <br />condition of approval no. 9 on the resolution for <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />