My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #28
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
05/16/2023 Special and Regular & Special HA
>
Correspondence - #28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2023 9:09:53 AM
Creation date
5/16/2023 8:23:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
28
Date
5/16/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory &Natsis LLP <br /> Attomeys at Law <br /> Santa Ana City Council <br /> May 16,2023 <br /> Page 2 <br /> (B)No net loss of the potential residential density of housing affordable to <br /> lower income households in the jurisdiction. <br /> (C) Affirmative furthering of fair housing. <br /> The Resolution is Premature <br /> As acknowledged in the staff report prepared by the City Planning and Building Agency ("City <br /> Planning"), AB 2011 is not yet operative. AB 2011 clearly states: "This act shall become operative <br /> July 1, 2023." Therefore, any attempt by the City Council to exempt parcels pursuant to the cited <br /> non-operative Government Code provisions will be legally ineffective. <br /> A Detailed Site Analysis is Required <br /> There is no evidence that City Planning has confirmed that the proposed "replacement"parcels <br /> meet the criteria described in subdivisions (b) and (e)to (h), inclusive, of Section 65912.121, as <br /> required. These include specific siting requirements for housing development projects under AB <br /> 2011, including but not limited to the requirement that the project site"satisfies the requirements in <br /> subparagraphs (B)to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4." (Gov. <br /> Code § 65912.121(g).) That Government Code section, which was added by SB 35 (2017) and is <br /> cross referenced in multiple state housing laws, includes extensive site requirements. For example, <br /> we question whether City Planning has confirmed that none of the"replacement" parcels are habitat <br /> for protected species. AB 2011 (pursuant to SB 35)provides that the housing development project <br /> cannot be located on a site that is any of the following: <br /> • Habitat for protected species, including candidate species, as specified. <br /> • Either prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as specified. <br /> • Wetlands, as specified. <br /> • Within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone, as specified. <br /> • A hazardous waste site, as specified. <br /> • Within a delineated earthquake fault zone, as specified. <br /> • Within a special flood hazard area, as specified. <br /> • Within a regulatory floodway, as specified. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.