My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #28
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
05/16/2023 Special and Regular & Special HA
>
Correspondence - #28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2023 9:09:53 AM
Creation date
5/16/2023 8:23:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
28
Date
5/16/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br /> From: John Hanna <jhanna@swmscarpenters.org> <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 2:44 PM <br /> To: eComment <br /> Subject: Item 28--Oppose or Continue this Flawed Resolution <br /> Madame Mayor and Councilmembers. My name is John Hanna, a 58 year resident of Orange County,former <br /> Santa Ana Planning Commissioner and a government affairs representative I am asking that the Council oppose the <br /> resolutions in Item 28 or, in the alternative continue the matter until your June 20 meeting so the two carpenters you <br /> know best, Rich Gomez and myself, can attend and we can get you a better informed opinion then you've received in <br /> your agenda. <br /> Ab 2011 and SIB 6 were signed into law over 7% months ago,to take effect July 1, 2023. City staff has waited until this <br /> late date to attempt to challenge these laws. Worse,they have ignored your Planning Commission, ignored <br /> councilmembers and ignored the residents and ignored those of us who had worked hard and were visibly engaged in <br /> passing these bills. I had spoken to your Director of Planning and Building safety about 2011 and many of you about <br /> working together to exempt certain areas as provided under 2011 while at the same time setting aside other <br /> comparable areas that would be covered by Ab 2011 provisions. Never once was I informed that the City was planning <br /> to engage to a nullification campaign,twisting the legislative intent and gutting the statute. <br /> AB 202112 in particular provides opportunities to get around barriers to development in certain areas. In order to utilize <br /> this statute, developers must agree to pay their workers the prevailing wage and if over 50 units, provide a health care <br /> plan for their workers and use apprentices. Your staff makes it clear they do not care what construction workers on <br /> private projects will make and essentially are willing to have city taxpayers continue to subsidize developers who refuse <br /> to pay a living wage or have a health insurance plan. It's like, hey, Santa Ana has other mechanisms to expedite housing <br /> so even though state law gives us a tool to expedite housing AND help our local workforce get a living wage with health <br /> insurance,we want to strip away that tool, notwithstanding we haven't bothered to get a legal opinion from the <br /> Attorney general's office permitting this nullification attempt. <br /> Please either dispose of this misguided effort now or at the very least continue this to the June 20 meeting. <br /> John Hanna <br /> suffitSi Governmental Affairs/Special Counsel <br /> P: 714.766.7140 <br /> M: 213.999.6190 <br /> o o�� Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters <br /> ° swcarpenters.or2 <br /> T(a(0* <br /> Download our app: <br /> Goo2le Play I iTunes App Store <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.