Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exhibit B <br />LeRoy Quick House <br />2218 N Ross Street <br />Santa Ana, CA 92706 <br />NAME <br />LeRoy Quick House <br />REF. NO. <br />ADDRESS <br />2216 North Ross Street <br />CITY <br />Santa Ana <br />ZIP <br />92706 <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />YEAR BUILT <br />1950 <br />LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Landmark <br />HISTORIC DISTRICT <br />I N/A <br />NEIGHBORHOOD <br />I Floral Park <br />CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION <br />C/3 <br />CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE <br />5S3 <br />Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted <br />❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both <br />ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Tudor Revival <br />The Tudor Revival looked to medieval England for its inspiration. Signature features of the style include steeply pitched <br />gables; decorative half-timbering; arched openings, often Tudor or Gothic in form; asymmetrical arrangements of building <br />features; tall brick chimneys; and picturesque windows of leaded glass or diamond patterned lights. The more ambitious <br />examples of the Tudor Revival were executed in brick or even stone; however, stucco over wood frame is quite common <br />in the forgiving climate of southern California. The Tudor Revival was favored primarily for residential buildings, although <br />small scale commercial buildings in the style also occur. Originating in the late 19th century, the Tudor Revival was <br />associated with some Craftsman era building but was most popular during the 1920s and 1930s. <br />SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: <br />The LeRoy Quick House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as a very <br />intact and highly individual example of the late Tudor Revival style in Santa Ana, keynoted by partial stone construction. <br />The recommended categorization is "Landmark" because it has unique architectural significance as an example of the <br />post -World War II Tudor Revival style with a partial stone construction in Floral Park and Santa Ana (Santa Ana Municipal <br />Code, Section 30-2.2). <br />EXPLANATION OF CODES: <br />• California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California. Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance <br />Series # 7, "How to Nominate Resources to the.California Register'of Historical Resources," September 4, 2001.), <br />3: It embodies thedistinctive characteristics of type, period, region, or method of construction, or <br />represents the work of a, master„ or possesses high artistic values <br />• It embodies the distinctive, characteristics of a type; period, region, or method of construction, or represents the <br />work of.a master, or possesses high artistic values. <br />5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation <br />