ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. (3)

Home Browse Search

of are day - (Task s Santa Ana of review s . City of work needed to issue of concern. the substance round the Draft EIR will EIR, can either be two nal i In the event the City's 75 comments that require technical corrections and CEQA compliance, CEQA environmental City Council (CC) public hearing bracketed and numbered that were not addressed in the EIR and applicable sections to approximately EPD has estimated may be necessary if excessive comments The estimated budget is based on professional based on coordinating the work with the applicant 12 comment lettersreceived on the Draft EIR. 120 hours ents, and assumes that no additional research will be required work or require substantially increasing the scope of to EPD as Planning Commission (PC) or that Review corresponding City staff. Peer with public Response to Comments (including late comments received after the 45 and n underline/strikethrough version of A any new or revised appendices as a result of addressed comments . Should this situation become apparent, we will discuss this concern with the City and technical adequacy of the Draft EIR. the Final EIR, including the following components: f needed) and Technical Study i ’s public hearing. Any comments that come after publication of the F .1 Administrative Draft Final EIR .2 Revised Draft Final EIR will distribute the hardcopy and/or electronic version of the Final EIR to Commenting Agencies, 55 IntroductionErrata (Electronic copies of the public comment period)Electronic copies of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Preparation of Final EIR/Response to Comments 5 will prepare eive direction about conducting this extra d shall seek and obtain written approval from the City before such costs are incurred. Regular odification to the scope of work, budget, and timeframe he City will forward the comment letters Task Subtask Final EIR EPD Errata If necessary, an Errata section will be included in the Final EIR to make minor clarifications to the Draft EIR.be provided. Response to Comments TEPD staff will provide adequate and complete responses to each Regular communication will occur with City staff to ensure that responses are accurate and thorough. Responses to Comments estimate assumes up to a response (irrespective of the number of letters received).staff hours, not the number of individual commto respond to comments and that the comments will be directed atenvironmental analysis, for both the project team and City staff for the Administrative Final EIR. comments/requested revisions are not addressed, then the round of comments does not count.Mreceived from agencies or the respond to the commentsancommunication will occur with City staff to ensure that responses are accurate and thorough. This proposal assumes that comments received will not raise issues that no new surveys, additional modeling, or new technical studies will be required to complete adequate responses. Should this not be the case, the EPD team will initiate discussion immediately with City staff to recThe City relevant internal City agencies,Subtask An Administrative Final EIR will be prepared incorporating these items for City review. Any City comments will be incorporated into the Final EIR for distribution to commenting public agencies at least 10 days before the projectaddressed in the staff report or at the Proposal for CEQA Related Bristol Specific Plan