My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
M
>
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 11:10:23 AM
Creation date
6/12/2023 4:47:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL
Contract #
A-2023-069-05
Agency
Community Development
Council Approval Date
5/2/2023
Expiration Date
6/30/2027
Destruction Year
2032
Notes
For Insurance Exp. Date see Notice of Compliance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Accreditation <br />Comment #1— How do we determine if a provider and their programs are accredited? <br />Resolution —Accreditation can be verified by visiting the Western Association of Schools and <br />Colleges, Senior College and University Commission (WSCUC) or WASC Accrediting Commission <br />for Community and Junior Colleges (WASC ACC1C) website and searching for the provider in <br />the directory of institutions. Direct links are provided in the policy. <br />Comment #2 — Do private postsecondary schools need to be Bureau of Private Postsecondary <br />Education (BPPE) approved and accredited by WASC? <br />Resolution — No, private providers must be either accredited by WASC, have BPPE Approval to <br />Operate, or meet the exemption criteria identified in California Education Code (CEC) Section <br />94874. See Attachment 1 under 3. Private Postsecondary Institutions for more information. <br />Comment #3 — Why is the accreditation only limited to Accrediting Commission for Schools <br />(ACS), WASC, the WSCUC? Why is accreditation limited to regional and not inclusive of any <br />Department of Education (DOE) accrediting agency in lieu of BPPE? There are specific <br />examples listed in bold italics that do include these exceptions, what's the difference? <br />Resolution —The BPPE oversees private postsecondary institutions operating in California with <br />the exception of those outlined in CEC Section 94874. Per CEC 94874(i) institutions accredited <br />by the ACS WASC, or WSCUC are exempt from the BPPE. Additional language expanding <br />acceptable accrediting agencies for Distance Education providers has been added on page 9 of <br />this directive. <br />Adult Education <br />Comment #4— Regarding defining providers of adult education as only those who provide <br />training under Title II of Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) (English as a <br />Second Language [ESL) and citizenship classes). This could exclude Regional Occupational <br />Programs (ROPs), community based schools, and any district that contract these services out <br />to local Community Based Organizations (CBOs). <br />Resolution —Training Employment and Guidance Letter (TEGL) 8-19, attachment 1, page 3 <br />includes "Eligible providers of adult education and literacy activities under WIOA Title II if such <br />activities are provided in combination with training services described in 20 Code of Federal <br />Regulations (CFR) § 680.350" as an eligible training provider. <br />Appeals <br />Comment #5 — Does the appeals process still work in the context of Local Workforce <br />Development Boards (Local Boards) "nominating" providers for the ETPL instead of placing <br />them on directly? Where should the appeals process start? <br />Resolution —The appeals process starts with the Local Board that issued the denial. If a <br />provider is denied inclusion on the ETPL, and wishes to appeal, the provider must submit its <br />appeal to the Local Board. <br />Page 2 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.