My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
M
>
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 11:10:23 AM
Creation date
6/12/2023 4:47:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL
Contract #
A-2023-069-05
Agency
Community Development
Council Approval Date
5/2/2023
Expiration Date
6/30/2027
Destruction Year
2032
Notes
For Insurance Exp. Date see Notice of Compliance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ETPL POLICY AND PROCEDURES ATTACHMENT 1 <br />Refunds (WSD19-10) for guidance on recovering training funds. <br />Outline any additional eligibility requirements providers and/or programs (except <br />apprenticeship programs) must meet to be listed on the local ETPL. <br />o These requirements must support the creation of a list that ensures provider <br />performance, job -driven training, informed consumer choice, continuous <br />improvement, and cost-effective investment of public funds. <br />o Requirements may include, but are not limited to: <br />Additional performance requirements. <br />■ Program location. <br />■ Accreditation requirements. <br />■ Cost. <br />Include the timeline for initial and continued eligibility review for inclusion on the local <br />ETPL. <br />o Continued eligibility review for the CA ETPL must be completed annually, and <br />review for the local ETPL must be completed at least once every two years. <br />o Within the federally required timeline in the previous bullet, Local Boards have <br />discretion on when they conduct initial and continued eligibility for inclusion on <br />the local ETPL. The following are just a few examples of options for local review: <br />■ Review entire local ETPL every two years. <br />■ Review each provider/program annually. <br />• Review on the anniversary of when the provider/program established <br />continued eligibility on the local ETPL. <br />• Process for delisting training provider/programs from the local ETPL. <br />• Provide comparable training opportunities if the training provider goes out of business. <br />If the training provider is a Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE) approved <br />provider, the policy should include the requirement to coordinate with BPPE's Office of <br />Student Assistant Relief. <br />Ensure training programs lead to at least one of the following: 1) credentials and/or <br />certificates valued by employers, or 2) training -related employment as a result of <br />gaining measurable technical skills for a specific occupation. This requirement ensures <br />that training programs lead to high -quality jobs, as described in the California Unified <br />Strategic Workforce Development Plan. Job quality serves the workforce development <br />system and broader public sector by protecting investments in training. Please see ETPL <br />Definitions (Attachment 2) for a definition of a postsecondary credential, as well as a <br />definition of a training program that leads to employment. <br />o Please note, a program on the ETPL that only leads to employment will <br />negatively affect a Local Board's Credential Attainment rate, since all individuals <br />in an education or training program are included in the measure. Please refer to <br />CoIIOBSActivity Codes (WSD19-06) Attachment 3 for a list of activity codes that <br />place individuals into the Credential Attainment performance measure. <br />WSD21-03 Page 4 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.